干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站

标题: 重磅突破!日本美女科学家研制新型万能细胞STAP(附原文) [打印本页]

作者: yinfuhua    时间: 2014-2-6 20:19     标题: 重磅突破!日本美女科学家研制新型万能细胞STAP(附原文)

本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2014-2-10 08:34 编辑 4 h5 s' L1 o" i, H/ y

# R. R$ S: F( r% T) h: d& d1 s9 P重磅突破!日本美女科学家研制新型万能细胞STAP
5 ^" J$ x4 |1 _2 I6 Y2014-02-06 1 来源:生物360 作者:koo + Q* F  l0 B4 n' w
[attach]58881[/attach]) [% O2 [: t* q# r2 b
科研团队骨干、研究领头人小保方晴子
/ L. J4 [& M9 l( Q3 ?) B) j日美研究人员在30日出版的英国《自然》杂志上报告说,他们成功培育出了能分化为多种细胞的“万能细胞”。与拥有同样能力的诱导多功能干细胞(iPS细胞)和胚胎干细胞相比,新细胞的制作方法更为简单安全,有望用于再生医疗领域。; g" _* p/ s& x
这种“万能细胞”是将体细胞放入弱酸性溶液中,通过施加刺激后制成的。由于是从外界刺激获得的多种分化能力,研究小组将这种细胞命名为 STAP 细胞,意思是触发刺激获得的多能性(Stimulus Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency)细胞 。此前科学界认为动物细胞无法单纯靠外界刺激转变成多能性细胞,但上述新细胞颠覆了这种看法。
7 m; d1 c- G* B& A; |( c" u" p [attach]58882[/attach]0 a) N# q4 z; _
日本理化学研究所、山梨大学和美国哈佛大学的研究人员从出生 1 周的实验鼠脾脏内采集出淋巴细胞,然后加入弱酸性的稀盐酸溶液中浸泡约 30 分钟。这种溶液的酸度与橙汁大体相同,温度为接近体温的 37 摄氏度。在继续培养 2 至 7 天后,其中 7% 至 9% 的细胞发育成了 STAP 细胞。
3 I5 q" ^0 q% V5 K$ o科研人员通过实验室研究和动物实验发现,这种细胞可以发育为神经细胞、肌肉细胞和肠道上皮细胞,甚至还具有诱导多功能干细胞和胚胎干细胞所不具备的转变为胎盘的能力。此后,研究人员还依据上述新方法,利用皮肤、肺和心肌的细胞成功制作出了 STAP 细胞。, Z/ a2 U+ _1 w0 k: [/ f3 D& Z; e- e
诱导多功能干细胞需要植入基因且需花费数周时间才能制作完成,成功率也很低,移植后还有癌变风险。与之相比, STAP 细胞的制作周期很短,成功率较高,在机体内发生癌变的可能性相对较低。& f+ ]3 A' I( v$ z  H" D3 f
研究人员指出,某些细胞受到刺激、发生应激反应后会陷入濒死状态, STAP 细胞就是在这种状态下形成的。今后他们还将继续研究这种细胞的形成机制,尝试利用人和其他动物的细胞制作这种“万能”细胞。
: [; F/ F, V% }# S [attach]58883[/attach]/ Q2 b' S7 I7 q# q$ v5 A
科研团队骨干、研究领头人小保方晴子称:“除了体内器官组织的再生外,STAP 细胞还会有助于因细胞应激反应产生的癌症的抑制等新型医疗技术的开发。”
6 U# {2 p# t1 E7 ~4 M山中教授评价“令人骄傲”
+ S; q/ k6 B& ^' B- |6 z- V2012 年诺奖得主、京都大学iPS细胞研究所所长山中伸弥教授对这一成果评价称:“这一重要研究成果由日本的研究者实现,令人骄傲。我期待着用人类的细胞也能以同样方法制作出万能细胞。”
- ~  y% V# f) b9 u+ k9 g, P原文检索:
; g+ i2 c$ F* s& ^% I$ p- yHaruko Obokata,Teruhiko Wakayama,Yoshiki Sasai,Koji Kojima,Martin P. Vacanti,Hitoshi Niwa,Masayuki Yamato& Charles A. Vacanti. Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency. Nature, 29 January 2014; doi:10.1038/nature129683 h' {6 y2 l8 W0 u+ U
Haruko Obokata,Yoshiki Sasai,Hitoshi Niwa,Mitsutaka Kadota,Munazah Andrabi,Nozomu Takata,Mikiko Tokoro,Yukari Terashita,Shigenobu Yonemura,Charles A. Vacanti& Teruhiko Wakayama. Bidirectional developmental potential in reprogrammed cells with acquired pluripotency. Nature, 29 January 2014; doi:10.1038/nature12969
1 V2 f( w& U/ W9 f+ i5 ~! [$ n5 Y; y, }# u+ g& I8 D- o! C
- t. T! {2 y0 h
12、13楼原文 感谢genedu 提供
作者: cell1314    时间: 2014-2-7 00:36

这个了不起,外部应激致使全能干细胞样改变,沿此思路下去将会有很多重大细胞分子生物学事件发生。日本小妞耗时五年证明,小日本的执着和专注值得我们深思和学习。。。。
作者: flywithiyiy    时间: 2014-2-7 10:21

学习!
作者: ciweiyuan    时间: 2014-2-7 10:29

已经拜读过大作,这个的确是令人exciting articles的文章,用这种方法刺激产生的细胞是比ips更早期的细胞状态,不仅可以有胚胎干细胞的特性还会有滋养层干细胞的特性,取决于后续的培养条件,超牛,如果能够重复出来,这成本比四因子诱导的方法低了海了去了。我预感ips的研究继续成为新的热点,希望分化的研究可以发展的更顺利,因为分化的研究对应用的影响会更直接。拙见,望大牛们指正。
作者: sannia    时间: 2014-2-7 10:58

越来越没有安全感了。
作者: biohacker    时间: 2014-2-7 11:23

Science的评论文章http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2014/01/acid-treatment-could-provide-breakthrough-stem-cell-technique& L- M" U* k; x1 D
/ K; e9 ~4 q: i9 E+ p/ Q6 \, k
Scientists have found a surprisingly simple way to turn mature cells back into a primitive state. Simply giving mouse blood cells an acid bath is enough to produce so-called pluripotent cells that can develop into any cell type in the body, they report in two new papers this week. The remarkable transformation contradicts many assumptions about cell biology and may ultimately lead to new ways to treat disease and injuries.
* W$ P: f* D. Y" w, ~; e科学家们发现了一种简单的方法,能让成熟细胞重新返回未分化状态。这种方法仅仅将小鼠血液细胞洗个酸水浴,有些细胞死亡,而存活下来的细胞有一部分会成为干细胞,这些干细胞可以在体内分化成各种类型的细胞。这一重大发现不仅会推翻细胞生物学的很多假设,而且有可能产生治疗人类疾病的革命性技术。
8 ^1 Z' Z" U+ K+ S# t* B4 ~6 ]8 ]
作者: face0117    时间: 2014-2-7 16:20

这与去年邓宏魁教授用四个小分子化合物诱导体细胞重编程为多潜能干细胞相比,哪一种方法更好?
作者: 好人好梦    时间: 2014-2-7 19:05

求原文啊
作者: ocean525252    时间: 2014-2-7 22:21

真棒,环境决定命运的证据越来越多!来吧~!
作者: qingchen    时间: 2014-2-7 22:34

好吧,我是来泼冷水的,也许大家不喜欢,但是我在拜读原文后认为这种细胞有没有基因的变异?并没有特别说明,而且其诱导方向依旧存在不确定性,所以我们不要高兴太早。更多的人去以此方法实验成功才能有更大价值。拙见!请指教!多批评!
作者: wtywty110    时间: 2014-2-8 14:46

看一下评论,难道真能如此简单就能将体细胞转化成多功能原始细胞,不论如何这是个很好的发现!
作者: genedu    时间: 2014-2-9 15:37

我来给原文吧
作者: genedu    时间: 2014-2-9 15:45

原文第二篇letter
作者: yangel    时间: 2014-2-9 21:39

尽管我倾向于相信这个方法的未来前景,但是我也泼些冷水,在我们彻底为此兴奋之前还需要经过几个大的考验:1 d& `3 H  N' \6 \  Y

( [6 o. j8 F: r3 `1. 其它实验室是否容易重复?我刚看到这个消息的第一反应就是too good to be true。但是既然这个工作也经过了nature的严审,背后的故事也那么动人,一切都那么美好,我更宁愿相信它是真的,否则就错大发了。因为整个诱导过程并不太长,估计很快就会有消息出来是否能够重复这一结果。让我们拭目以待!
8 p) l1 {: y4 f/ K0 ], I3 R
+ }! q' z  i* X9 ]3 c2. 有没有基因突变或表观遗传的缺陷?这种stress的方法非常类似于一些癌症细胞起始的过程。大家都知道,癌症的起始过程中往往伴有基因突变。如果STAP也有明显基因突变的话,尤其是抑癌基因突变的话,这个方法的意义将会大打折扣。1 o1 l9 P) T! v$ g+ {

; ^/ Y) U+ R" b; {% V3 l  e6 _5 R3. 人的细胞将来能不能用该方法做?看起来目前没有做到,至少是不好做,其实连小鼠成体的细胞都没有数据支持诱导至pluripotency。未来怎么做到人的,仍待继续关注!: x) a0 ~; ]9 e4 y& f/ n
+ {9 i/ Y6 o, h6 N- ~

作者: yinfuhua    时间: 2014-2-9 23:41

回复 genedu 的帖子
% ?; i( T, m% M$ ]
6 D0 O2 F6 U. W0 V: i) {5 Y谢谢提供原文。
作者: yinfuhua    时间: 2014-2-9 23:41

回复 genedu 的帖子  z/ Y" h$ ~- x9 A4 N
% ?" J* S2 K3 M- z
谢谢!
作者: usa    时间: 2014-2-10 13:33

我个人理解是更接近胚胎干细胞的特性,相比ips
作者: 山登绝顶我为峰    时间: 2014-2-11 10:30

本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2014-2-12 09:28 编辑
6 I% F2 ], H; P* X* e" l; F1 z1 \- |, Q7 z0 Y9 P; {! w5 X1 |% O' x
原文:- X9 J; d- Q2 x5 j2 q

作者: yinfuhua    时间: 2014-2-11 11:01

回复 山登绝顶我为峰 的帖子& Q$ G1 X; O7 g+ z

- Z1 L. Q+ _. q5 j/ }# n谢谢提供原文。
作者: yangel    时间: 2014-2-11 14:20

推荐一篇质疑STAP的文章,说的很客观很中肯!
* o$ K9 r/ [* x* ]+ }! d0 P( T- x  [
In a pickle over STAP stem cells: top 5 reasons for skepticism
2 ~  I( H3 w' ?9 v; ^/ ~% U9 N. n  ^& K8 X& N1 j3 p
Posted on February 6, 2014
  z! P' x1 l6 m9 i! f" i6 l
+ Q1 [- ^- j$ B# T; O" fin a pickleIf you take an ordinary cucumber and soak it in a mild acid solution of vinegar for a few weeks you get a pickle.$ Z2 X  k! o& C% p# _

& O+ U1 E. z  C) GRecently, some scientists reported in Nature that if you take ordinary cells and soak them in a mild acid solution for 30 minutes, often the cells transformed into the most powerful type of stem cells known to science." K# z/ v9 t* E) n) Y

! V4 P- ~4 c% n2 AThese newly incarnated pluripotent or totipotent stem cells, which they termed “STAP” stem cells, reportedly can make any known type of cell and maybe even an entire embryo along with its own placenta.- l) E% H& f5 G, K) h. e$ S/ [
( h& R# B4 i7 n- d, I! W$ ]
Now that’s no pickle.( M: x" M' t7 U

7 g5 s6 ~$ O3 r/ f/ s7 p% h/ P- y: _The authors reported that it doesn’t even have to be acid, but any number of stresses will do the trick.
! B! b' A* z3 ^) L2 u7 h/ G7 F5 Y! Q
' l* D! U% r4 YJust how amazing is this? It’d be like putting your cucumber in vinegar to make a pickle and instead finding the cucumber had changed into a living, swimming goldfish in the jar." r; T; s3 m6 ^2 x: l
% K% \2 K& u0 ^% g- H! Y) @2 l
We’ve seen some amazing things in the stem cell field turn out to be completely true such as iPS cells, but somehow from day 1 I had no doubt about iPS cells.% H2 x# B! y0 P. ~" S* C7 F" u

$ M& z8 m# a9 T6 w2 g( eExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and independent replication. STAP stem cells aren’t there…at least not yet.% w( d, r8 b0 `* [  @

8 Z0 j2 R: t" d. }! L/ L! `Five more specific reasons make me skeptical of STAP stem cells at this point.( \4 x1 f0 D- o3 s1 r! m( Y
7 [6 [! c. I! ~! i6 p
1. The STAP method & results are illogical. I’m not a Vulcan like Spock on Star Trek, but I believe logic and common sense are keys to science. To me STAP defies common sense. Illogical doesn’t necessarily mean wrong, but it raises doubts. STAP just seems too good to be true.
: Q, L2 N3 |  @, ?! F& I2. The STAP team previously reported “spore” stem cells, which to my knowledge have not been independently replicated. They reported in 2001 the discovery of “spore stem cells” that are a micron or two in size, behave kind of like fungal spores, can take a beating, and may have a “minimal genome” contained in an atypical, tiny nucleus. Dr. Vacanti recently told me that STAP stem cells and spore stem cells are believed to be the same thing.
/ ]7 R0 \4 N. f2 }# l# ?3. The team also previously reported adult pluripotent stem cells. Drs. Vacanti and Obokata also published a surprising paper in 2011 reporting to have found pluripotent stem cells in adult tissues. I’m not a believer in such cells, but other folks do believe in such cells and call them VSELs or MUSE.
: X- Y* q2 X3 A7 N4. Evolution should have selected against a hair trigger for conversion to pluriopotency or totipotency. A process for any ordinary mature cell to go back in developmental time easily trigged by any one of a host of different stressors would be harmful, even deadly to organisms. In that reality, we should see teratoma or teratocarcinoma tumors–the kind that arise from pluripotent or totipotent stem cells–sprouting up all over the body after injuries or even just spontaneously, but that doesn’t happen. The key concept here is that in the wrong developmental context (in a child or an adult rather than in an embryo), embryonic-like stem cells would not behave normally just to fix tissues and then stop. Rather they’d make tumors. Evolution should select against that. Now if the authors had reported STAP stem cells as multipotent tissue specific stem or progenitor cells that might have made sense as a mechanism for tissue repair. But they didn’t.4 ]6 V+ s- M3 B, a
5. Why the delay to make human STAP cells?  The team says they made mouse STAP stem cells successfully in 2011, but only now in 2014 are they just starting to try to make human STAP stem cells. What the heck? Wouldn’t trying to make human STAP stem cells have been something they should have done immediately in 2011 or even done at the same time as trying to make the mouse ones? There may well be a good reason for this delay, but again it’s just something that is puzzling./ |) S! i! B& ?0 u! ]% W
What’s the bottom line? In the end, right now we cannot be 100% sure either way about STAP stem cells. However, we’ll know if STAP cells are the real deal within as short as two months because quite a few labs are now trying the technique. Again, I believe the odds are it won’t work, at least not in a reasonably close fashion to what was reported in these Nature papers. Sure, we might see some people say to the media or even publish papers indicating that they can kinda sorta almost make STAP-like cells with certain stressors sometimes, but my prediction is that it still won’t be very convincing.
  Y6 T) F3 I5 T
8 [5 F  B4 y6 K/ S6 ?$ pI really hope I am wrong and if I am you’ll read my happy mea culpa right here.' h% \% N, I* Z

作者: murong    时间: 2014-2-11 16:15

回复 山登绝顶我为峰 的帖子
/ h: ?5 c4 b' ^( J6 T- \( Q, ?* y+ F1 v# G. r# I' n6 w6 z
原文几天前就出来了,看看这个帖子http://www.stemcell8.cn/thread-76054-1-2.html
作者: hjp326    时间: 2014-2-13 13:39

楼上说的没错,IPS干细胞的研究早在80-90年代已经有人提出,并且成功发现了培养方法,使用特殊的培养液来使干细胞分化。希望坚持这条路继续下去是正确的方向。
作者: yinfuhua    时间: 2014-2-13 14:54

回复 murong 的帖子
) \" f* `$ ]: `! P; A9 ~5 c+ Y3 h; d* ^% i/ z8 u6 e
谢谢提供原文。
作者: evial    时间: 2014-2-15 11:59

我要看全文




欢迎光临 干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站 (http://www.stemcell8.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5