|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑
" p' S8 o' d: k% |4 }& |9 O$ _( l$ b% w$ q8 ~; c" O! K
The first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on
' g, b: L8 V" {' R% ^# o/ F4 |Climate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science$ T3 A# @6 p) J+ [0 l
of global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week.
2 P }& @5 t& o0 f! u2 jThis will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;
6 l" o4 g: w* X5 J. G+ j' y! Ksome 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things8 p2 |. k. ^5 B* n
have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to6 w# h5 z" w- q7 J9 i% m' j( }2 A
rethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from
5 E) `# n* N# v, v. \8 o* Eall who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but+ f u; L& L: L5 |5 A2 n% y) K1 G
the current report should be its last mega-assessment.
' W( s' h; Y3 l; q
7 P+ l( A# R) }- ]3 P$ R
& M; @' L2 Y/ V3 O7 D7 k4 n
7 u; m* X+ J2 G2 Z3 Y
/ v2 ^ _* q" A3 U- K- X% x& y: e& R
4 C$ D( Q5 a% l( Y# f$ d% H! D; ~6 Y2 V( ?5 f9 F8 u& Y
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-22 14:40
发表于 2013-9-25 00:24
