|

- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|

本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑 8 H$ Y, {" v5 b! h3 |# w
6 i. h) D( }* E& w2 r
The first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on9 Y9 S$ ~+ |5 y |% N
Climate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science% X4 b2 W. n$ T- F+ F0 X
of global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week.# G3 \- J0 i8 m; k: F
This will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;
2 h. A4 r# c, b3 V" [4 }some 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things! k) D! v, U$ C% T. E# m
have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to9 i7 W: m& _! j: E @( d3 F* v; x
rethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from5 y. ]. M. A3 m! s! C( M( \
all who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but
, [) D9 k* G5 V5 P# i9 z) D4 Q" wthe current report should be its last mega-assessment.
) V- c1 ]5 a7 [: K8 h8 C7 k" N- D" W: z* R2 v% C
" T) d5 _" Q9 A M3 A
7 m% l% r6 D( D* D6 y. M
1 N3 @$ g7 S6 _( w) X' M7 d1 g( d. X6 ?5 O
- {0 D5 F- s( p4 r- x
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|