|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑 & e/ b& k; H7 q9 p
# o! X- \5 V) _9 B
The first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on
6 T9 D4 a u- L* |2 xClimate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science
. `: w- s) J* E: P, `- M C0 yof global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week.% d% s9 J5 _3 [7 ~) U1 e9 {
This will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;" \& I8 x5 y+ {
some 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things
, f x0 r9 L* U9 {* p3 K7 r9 ?have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to6 q# q0 g/ a% P2 N* h0 P9 k
rethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from
4 ~" N3 v5 h8 s7 W+ s& X4 `; w7 c+ dall who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but: a _7 f% M) P1 I
the current report should be its last mega-assessment. L% e* ?7 q/ q7 \
6 L& h8 `. n! t6 g3 [/ R4 ^4 L8 E
* R' Y; \2 {3 D- c% v3 U4 j
! U+ j3 l2 G9 A2 _( {
8 j( e$ K/ K: q$ b) I; p. S7 l' ~* T! ]# a
8 K$ C. c4 H( h9 o+ }$ X
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-22 14:40
发表于 2013-9-25 00:24
