2013年12月5日 Nature

nero1981

2013年12月5日 Nature' N5 B* }) L( ?% E

2 O& r% x1 z1 L- ]- P; u. I- hCurrent theories on the formation of our Moon have
- O( s: K( J/ `9 W! j3 x  D: S. Ytaken something of a battering from recent observations and the latest computer
; a" }! K, \5 Usimulations. In this issue of Nature, Robin Canup in a Comment, and . G" B7 D! h( u: V" H0 T3 [  e, A  N
contributions from Tim Elliott and Sarah Stewart in a News & Views Forum,
4 \& d$ W* z* E4 Z7 r2 Xpresent their views on how theoretical treatments can respond to the challenge. 0 V7 @6 k  B) U; X
Image credit: Julien Salmon and Robin Canup/Southwest Research Institute
2 l1 _! G( r& N6 v' D$ I4 E7 e: g. s

. B9 ~/ J6 L8 @: ]' ?9 r9 b( V# c: M

游客，如果你要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

xiangchou812

感谢分享！！！

stwgch1987

看看

zorro

thanks

sysuhoo

谢谢分享

一群小水滴

好 东东

Boas

谢谢楼主分享。

ziyunfei1982

thanks

qichunyu

感谢

sea200k

谢谢lz- M3 s" |+ |- m0 @, k! }% a) z
7 C$ ?. V" Y0 O/ C1 `: i