哈佛Brigham and Women's hospital公布了STAP试验protocol

梅筱松

支持

梅筱松

没想到这个关注度这么高。。这是http://www.ipscell.com/上对该protocol的回应。确切说是很负面的。1 ~5 q9 O$ {. I
! e0 _6 z( k8 n7 G# I) ?
The thing that first struck me most strongly about this published protocol is that it is not the same protocol reported in the Nature papers and it also is not the same as the recently posted RIKEN STAP protocol.（首先令人震惊的是该操作与nature上的不一样而且和最近的RIKEN上的操作也是不一样的）& V4 u& l) p! B: ^, L8 r

1 O4 s) S& p2 V0 G3 S) MGiven that the two STAP papers were just published 7 weeks in Nature, how can there already be so many different protocols coming from one collaborative team? I don’t know, but it seems puzzling to me.（仅隔7周便在nature上给出两个STAP的操作，我不清楚为什么从一个团队里冒出这么多不同的操作步骤，但这个的确困扰了我）$ Z) l) O7 v# I  z

2 o9 `, {+ |9 q% E0 U
" C0 C* U0 e4 `% Z) |0 l( S接着又写了里面步骤中的不少问题。希望有帮助。