干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站

 

 

搜索
干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站 干细胞之家论坛 干细胞行业新闻 MIT Review 关于针对癌症干细胞研发药物的公司Slingerla ...
朗日生物

免疫细胞治疗专区

欢迎关注干细胞微信公众号

  
查看: 25809|回复: 2
go

MIT Review 关于针对癌症干细胞研发药物的公司Slingerland的报道 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

积分
153 
威望
153  
包包
702  
楼主
发表于 2015-9-17 17:47 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
本帖最后由 tcaact 于 2015-9-17 17:50 编辑 * [( I$ x' m' ^' n
5 P* O+ o, P% S
想来做一件事,还是要静心,慢慢来。( n! T( T, _5 t% Q

& W$ N1 K+ o) c. V; ?) ]+ r希望国内的创业环境也能成熟起来。
$ ^" T% @  A& v, j. q( K  S
7 W5 v" `+ Y5 R8 P+ l1 u5 T" b原文链接:http://www.technologyreview.com/ ... -cancer-stem-cells/
5 |- A3 L5 t) b  K  O& E6 i
. M, W0 k0 V9 O7 `+ d, l( q) K全文如下:
  p- a+ y2 G  O9 C5 ?% k& k# p: B- g" V5 k4 n9 v" E
Peter Thiel Backs Biotech “Unicorn” Fighting Cancer Stem Cells0 G7 R2 p# K; |7 Q
Are stem cells at the root of common cancers? A startup named Stemcentrx thinks so.) c0 O8 r  o& I& a. |

. ?/ w6 p; c6 UBy Antonio Regalado on September 8, 2015
+ U, G& @. ?) r- E+ M5 G
3 f0 @% j# s. s. {: O3 U0 Q/ |WHY IT MATTERS( S. b. x, I7 y) A
$ \- V- N& b% p* D0 c, @. n$ J
Nearly 600,000 Americans die of cancer each year, and private investors can help fund the research to cure it.# z* O7 s, v; e2 X- e

; \6 ?$ r2 F# m% w) I) p( B5 yThis laboratory space in San Francisco was built by the biotechnology company Stemcentrx to manufacture cancer drugs.+ @5 U* K% j; ]: C

6 P! h, x1 z' |, q9 `8 dIn 2002, Scott Dylla, a skinny postdoc with a Minnesota accent, answered a Craigslist ad for a room for rent in Palo Alto. Although he couldn’t afford to move in with Brian Slingerland, then an up-and-coming technology banker at Credit Suisse, the two got to talking., V' N1 ~( v  J0 p! f1 k& v8 I
* t1 J; I4 ~& q4 Z1 d# P1 Z
Two of Slingerland’s aunts had died of cancer, one only a year after she retired. The other died of lung cancer. She’d always smoked Kents.
: {, X! ?! w+ S5 o% e" o6 D, P: t! d2 p2 s# Z6 _! m
“Will we be able to cure cancer?” Slingerland wanted to know.
' X* b4 F' u2 e: `7 s
+ a) e% E2 s& i* t" p  T“Yes. By targeting stem cells,” ventured Dylla, who was starting a position at a lab at Stanford University to investigate the question.  A$ c+ r. }) y" o& D7 ~8 C  {
" @" \% ?+ Z2 s! I: v
Thirteen years later that conversation has evolved into what is one of the most highly valued private biotech startups of all time. The company the pair started, Stemcentrx, has raised $500 million and is valued at $3 billion, people familiar with its finances say, a nearly unprecedented value for a company with no revenue, facing the usual R&D obstacles, and that almost no one has heard of.4 C! i- O! e, T8 n
- f2 {8 w! Z5 f4 d- n5 V
Silicon Valley is used to “unicorns,” those private, usually profitless, and fast-growing tech companies worth a billion dollars or more, like Snapchat, Square, and Uber. Now the same phenomenon is spreading to biotech, where investors are throwing money at companies that promise to beat the historically low odds of drug success.* n/ t8 {# Y" D* G, ^! O3 _0 v
2 d) c' D6 D. W+ S# m9 c, N- _* m5 ?: v
Stemcentrx thinks its chances are better than average. Its founders have recruited grizzled biotech pros, built a “vivarium” that houses 18,000 white mice, and established a glass-enclosed factory floor where the company is already making its own experimental drugs. These drugs, Slingerland says, will be like “laser-guided missiles attached to atomic bombs.” The company intends to drop its payloads on at least 10 types of cancer in the next couple of years.
8 k4 w! f9 w) i9 h: e2 E1 h" H* j) G8 z+ D
The company is unusual because it’s betting on a scientific idea that’s not universally accepted—that cancer is caused not by any cell that goes rogue, but by rare and powerful cancer stem cells.
. B, o6 @" D: P' r
) k3 P" k- ^' g6 Y# n$ Q: j0 PStemcentrx’s contrarian premise—that stem cells can be bad, not good—has drawn some impressive backers, including Sequoia Capital, Elon Musk, and most notably Founders Fund, the investment firm led by Peter Thiel, the Midas-touch investor who discovered Facebook.
- C! H: {1 d( p. J! Q8 u: I7 L
# p2 P6 l2 p, n  g& XThiel says his fund has invested $200 million in Stemcentrx. It is the fund’s largest investment ever in a single company, he says, surpassing well-known names like SpaceX, Spotify, and Palantir. It’s also two to three times the total Thiel has invested in about 25 other biotechnology firms (see “A Contrarian in Biotech”).' u4 L+ ?5 p0 o9 @0 S* }, d" f2 z

! w  x" t* l3 MLast month, when Stemcentrx closed its latest financing round of $250 million, the investors were led by the mutual fund giant Fidelity, suggesting that plans for an IPO can’t be far off. Other companies targeting cancer stem cells include OncoMed and Verastem, both already public.) B4 b. Z0 M# z9 b- Q3 K9 W

8 H9 T+ l; X" i* \If hardly anyone has heard of Stemcentrx until now it is because the company has been hiding in plain sight. It occupies three floors on San Francisco’s bay overlooking the back gates of the Genentech campus, employs 140 people, and brings in Ronnie Lott, the former 49ers defender, as an inspirational speaker. But it hasn’t tossed out any press releases—and until last week it barely had a website. “With all the information out there, it’s surprisingly easy to remain stealth,” says Slingerland.
+ {% t: K6 k6 q- s8 h" a
3 `( q+ s0 g. B1 l1 ?) BMonday marked a new step for the company as doctors working with it presented the results of its first clinical trial at a lung cancer meeting in Denver. They showed early results for an antibody drug it manufactures and that targets what Dylla says are stem cells that cause small-cell lung cancer. That’s the same deadly kind of lung cancer that killed Slingerland’s aunt; 30,000 Americans are diagnosed with it each year, fewer than 10 percent surviving more than five years.
3 i. U. K1 @3 x$ \
3 @$ n& G8 ]6 }- H/ W+ }The study had 80 people in it and was primarily organized to find a safe dose of the drug, not to prove it works. Yet there are promising hints. Overall, tumors shrank more often than they did in response to the only approved drug to treat the cancer, topotecan. For patients whose cancer exhibits the stem-cell marker the drug aims at, benefits were larger. How much the drug really helps is a question for a larger study that the company hopes to begin soon. It’s one of three drugs the company is already testing in human trials.
. ]: [8 p2 w& v  E- i, ^6 @' J7 |/ B# @3 A( `! r
1 j' S6 {& o8 U) z8 l1 B& {
Workers handle chemicals used to poison lung cancer cells.
  }1 ]2 ~; U4 E6 f# N1 ^- h1 m+ ]7 l7 L* A) I: v
Unlike tech companies that can sprout phenomenal valuations in a year or two, most biotech companies get there only after years of work and as evidence for an idea or drug accumulates. After the chance Craigslist meeting, Dylla went to work in the lab of Irv Weissman, a leading stem-cell biologist. By then, Canadian scientists had found that one form of leukemia is caused by a cancer stem cell, the first clear demonstration of the idea. Researchers at the University of Michigan made the case in 2003 that the same was true in breast cancer.
0 S) ~5 Q0 Y! e8 X/ r  c# r1 G/ G# ~% T. i
Could it be true of every cancer? In 2008, Slingerland, who had joined the technology investment bank Qatalyst Partners, decided to use his own money, and that of some early investors, to fund Dylla to begin working on the idea independently. If cancerous stem cells were real, it might explain the temporary benefits of chemotherapy. People had been killing the wrong cells. Maybe the cancer was flowing out from a few, rare cells that evaded treatment and could start the cancer all over again.
. w2 r% D0 s. d0 i( {  V+ {  ~% x, p# D1 G/ ?
If so, drugs were needed to target and kill the stem cells. “Ripping out the root of the tree,” Dylla calls it.
8 q# \' p3 h9 N* y& N; g. O1 K8 e6 T# d! a
Thiel says he invested so much not only because the founders had yin and yang—Dylla is earnestly technical, while Slingerland is a finance pro—but because he believed the company could reduce the odds of failure. “Our theory was that it was a biotech company that looked a little more like a software company,” says Thiel, who started investing in 2012. “The whole company was designed to get the probability of success closer to 1.”) T) B/ k# F7 Q7 U. `8 ^0 P  {
3 v7 e! n% t& }: G2 W! c0 Y2 K
One aspect of that design was a methodical—and expensive—way of zeroing in on what cell type in a tumor is the ultimate culprit. At Stemcentrx it’s done by inserting bits of freshly obtained human cancers under the skin of a mouse with no immune system, a so-called xenograft. The cancer that grows is collected and divided into different cell types. Then each fraction is implanted into other mice. The process, called “limiting dilution,” gets repeated as long as it takes to find the one type of rare cell that never fails to regenerate a tumor just like the original. That’s the cancer stem cell.
/ k- s! y9 X" O7 q/ N5 Q. _9 t" p0 P/ u% G% ^1 B) k  H9 m' `5 j
At the Stemcentrx labs, I saw technicians skinning dark balls of lung tumors the size of lychee nuts, then dicing them with a razor blade. Researchers run the cells through sorting machines, using chemical markers to separate them into different types. Dylla says the company grafts tumor cells into more than 150 mice a day.
4 p* u9 D; k4 z) m0 q4 r- @/ S9 j) m/ T* T9 z- p9 V
The aim isn’t only to find a specific cell that can generate a cancer, but also a unique molecular marker that identifies it. One discovery Stemcentrx says it made was to find a protein, called DLL3, that appears on what it thinks are stem cells responsible for small cell lung cancer. The drug they created to kill these cells is a chemical toxin linked to an antibody that attaches to this protein, lock and key style.
" c- x. E( o5 W; s: S
# M5 }, x3 k9 S4 h6 mSome labs study cancer stem cells by growing them in a petri dish, where they form blobs called “spheroids.” It’s a cheaper, faster way to do drug studies, but not as accurate in Dylla’s thinking. Cells grown in a laboratory dish tend to become different, accumulating unusual mutations, and end up less like the original tumor. If you find a drug that kills these, what’s the guarantee it will work the same way in a person? There isn’t any: most drugs fail because lab studies can’t accurately predict what will happen when a person takes it., i( @' A8 L& ]1 m* w
- i3 A( M6 X4 ?+ f
At Stemcentrx, tumors from 600 different people and from a dozen types of cancer grow inside its mice. Dylla’s conviction is that if its drugs can cure the animals, the chances are higher they will help people. For Stemcentrx to justify its lofty valuation, it probably needs a success rate about three times the biotech average.' a8 j& t' ]) n4 g
8 w- d8 g/ D1 F9 L& q
What’s more, the company is betting on a paradigm that’s still hotly contested. The stem-cell theory implies that cancer is organized like an organ such as the liver, whose stem cells constantly make new specialized cells—for example, after you’ve nuked a few during a night of bar-hopping. In the cancer-stem-cell scenario, a tumor would work in a similar way. So if you destroyed the relatively rare stem cells, the cancer couldn’t grow back.
( ?) M" b8 `% A. ^5 y
) ^9 m: |3 a' w2 J) o
* W% V, ?: z& |. S9 GBut what if there are no special stem cells? What if, instead, most or all the cells in a tumor can do the job of spreading it? In academic labs, the two theories have been duking it out for a decade, but the stem-cell theory is the one that lately has been taking some punches. For instance, scientists recently made a convincing case that in skin cancer there is no special, rare stem cell, as some had predicted. They showed that if they simply switched to a different kind of mouse, a quarter of the human melanoma cells were able to cause cancer. “There is a major debate that is still going on and I don’t know if it’s going to be resolved so easily,” says Ravi Majeti, a biologist at Stanford who studies leukemia. “It’s a complicated story, and I would say the cancer-stem-cell theory is waning a little bit.”$ T1 d8 Q+ {) }
4 E' i4 n; ?+ D" o4 x
Given evidence on both sides, Majeti says new support for the theory may need to come from a clinical trial in human subjects. “The ultimate proof is when, by targeting only the stem cells, you eradicate the cancer,” he says.* r' c7 i6 u3 y$ ]- {

  _8 o( o" O- P; q" V5 hIn an all-hands meeting held last week at Stemcentrx, Slingerland revealed the results of its first clinical trial as a DJ played “I Will Survive.” He introduced recent hires and previewed the company’s new website, replacing a plain-looking one with a single paragraph of text. “We asked them to make it like the Apple of biotech,” he says. He told his employees how much the new investors had put in, and what their shares and options were now worth.) M# L% D) R7 }4 f2 @; z6 w7 [1 t+ N

% j! O  r* y: f4 ^; J) B! bIt’s a lot of money, or at least it could be. Slingerland says he doesn’t want too much focus on his company’s status as a biotech unicorn. “This isn’t worth anything to us until we get these drugs approved,” he told his employees.
已有 1 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
细胞海洋 + 2 + 10 极好资料

总评分: 威望 + 2  包包 + 10   查看全部评分

Rank: 2

积分
153 
威望
153  
包包
702  
沙发
发表于 2015-9-17 18:58 |只看该作者
不好意思 把公司创始人之一的名字误写做公司名称了 公司名称是 “Stemcentrx”
) @8 H0 z5 U* A
+ u6 ?) J2 e+ e" D7 L' |# t" r' a顺便贴上生物谷转发的奇点的相关报道 《Peter Thiel如何投资生物科技公司》
: D7 k2 f5 ^7 O& ^$ h0 S* R; s0 k7 F: _5 I, [  e8 O
http://www.bioon.com/trends/news/614755.shtml
/ N2 ]% Y$ Y1 d  N& H* v! C' \
4 |& l! d. {* F& Y( sPeter Thiel如何投资生物科技公司2 V& r7 m8 g5 y& R

7 P/ e: v- G6 f! c9 I/ {) s  q作者:奇点网/周伦来源:奇点网/周伦2015-9-16 16:35:15
$ i5 k* J' m/ ?+ L3 R. p) Y% J$ G) W. {
关键词: Peter Thiel 投资 生物科技& o' z; ]  h; k6 U
: |/ t2 g/ N$ a2 |+ r5 G, Z
Peter Thiel如何投资生物科技公司1 \( f9 |: Y. @7 w

9 c9 c  m% [, A6 o2012年Peter Thiel的投资基金向Stemcentrx公司投了2亿美金,这是该基金有史以来最大规模的一次豪赌。此次投资金额,是Thiel投资的另外25家生物技术公司总额的3倍左右。然而,Stemcentrx公司却仅仅是坐落于旧金山的一家生产抗癌药物,名不见经传的私人企业。但是,本周它获得了令人咋舌的10亿美金的估值。* E% f, \  N% N$ D& `; q' C4 [

8 [5 x' g- F- B- E' r2 tStemcentrx作为一家药品刚刚进入测试阶段的公司,竟有如此之高的估值,这到底是不是在炒作呢?这一现象在Twitter上也引起了热议。毕竟,有一个名为OncoMed的生物技术公司,使用类似的方法和药物治疗癌症,可是它的估值却远远不及Stemcentrx。& t  m& R, y% c, [0 p
0 b4 {: ]' v* L1 Y
实际上,生物科技股已经被投资者哄抬到难以置信的程度。在过去的3年里,有大量的生物科技公司走上IPO之路,纳斯达克生物科技指数比历史同一时期上涨了250%。这部分原因要归功于大家对新疗法的乐观态度,比如一款治疗丙型肝炎的药物打破了以往药物的销售记录。股市暴涨的一个副作用是,大量的资金迅速流转到小型私有生物技术公司。2 w% J: ^8 x$ ^' j

- j. Q, j% w4 h; g3 |, ~( OThiel是PayPal的联合创始人,现在是投资公司Founders Fund的负责人,对于生物技术领域来说,他还是一个新人。因此MIT的记者就Thiel在生物技术领域的投资方法,对Thiel展开了采访。以下是采访内容的节选。
1 g( v' H; @' J) M8 A' D6 p: Z1 B3 U. A- q% [3 `9 r, f
这是Founders Fund有史以来给单一公司投的最大一笔资金,你喜欢这家公司的什么?
  I3 q7 t6 T  _4 J  M) a5 _+ O  Y  o) c0 q2 j8 }. ~$ B, g
我喜欢Brian和Scott。这两个创始人都非常强大,并且他们是互补的。我认为他俩的组合是经典硅谷创业模式,一个强大的技术加上一个强大的商业团队。现在我们很难再看到像他们这样强强联合的组合。' V" I7 q" a/ W$ U# G6 ^1 H
; G' m2 a( w1 z* y/ k
另外,Stemcentrx作为一家生物技术公司,看起来却像软件公司。我们认为,软件公司都有非常高的资本效率,资本可以获得难以置信的回报,这就是我们投资的原因。; y: U& x8 F! y- h! ]1 v

+ a5 c' K) m$ d2 m! y( t投资生物科技类公司有哪些挑战?) z7 J$ c8 _5 C+ z! A1 i* Q

4 m4 Q: @  \! m) @4 i' nBill Gates曾经说过一句话,他说他像喜欢小孩子一样喜欢编程,因为你说什么他们就会做什么。软件和生物技术有个很大的区别:软件会根据你的指令办事,但是生物学研究不会。: G* o5 {" S. [2 a' e+ `
, f- \& s% y5 `$ l( x; f' Q3 S
生物技术研究面临的一个挑战是,生命科学太复杂,又很随机。有太多的意外因素导致研究失败。比如说,你现在在做一个小研究,取得了很好的结果。但是接下来还有另外的5个研究,需要你继续取得好结果。/ h+ c* s0 R. h7 p

. N' N( h9 b. z  c) Z$ Y你如何知道一家初创公司价值几何?
* y1 L8 M7 _3 P) G
4 T. |4 t5 v! [. ~5 F4 ^: ^如果一家公司能够生产一种特效药,这种药可以治愈一大类无药可治的疾病,那么这家公司就值10亿,甚至100亿美金。当然,如果这家公司失败了,那就一文不值了。
( x' k( r0 R! j) r* K& i0 U' l' @/ ]" r2 |# `
一般来讲,药企生产一种药,必须通过基础研究,临床前,I期,II和III试验,最终上市。每一步都充满了风险,关键的问题在于你怎么折算每一步的成功的概率。假如你认为每一步的成功概率是二分之一的话,经过6步之后,成功的概率就是六十四分之一,那么这家公司的估值要达到10亿美元的话,它的初始价值必须达到1600万美元。: W7 T9 H$ g8 [' }4 a- u
; Z8 j$ m6 M( X7 u- j
作为一名投资人,我很不喜欢这一点儿,因为这些数字完全是随机的。以我们对生物技术公司的感觉来看,人们远远低估了失败的概率。那些公司告诉你成功的概率是二分之一,但实际上它可能是十分之一。如果哪怕是其中仅有一步是十分之一,就会给你带来极大的麻烦。如果我投资一家公司,这家公司说这件事情要做成的话,需要“这里要正常,这里要正常,这里要正常,这里也要正常”,那么,我就会疯掉。  P  f4 b, \) ~+ z% e: b

7 H; N' V: i* U; q6 i( F/ d- R那么,Stemcentrx有什么不同?! p6 G# N) p% p" q+ `+ }
5 @; l! ^% b5 u! E2 |+ t
现在的问题是,你是否能够改变这些数字?我们之所以以如此高的估值投资Stemcentrx,是因为它的每一步成功的概率都接近1,他们尽最大的努力避免意外的发生。Stemcentrx公司的这一点,让我们深感欣慰。# H6 C* C: p( _  `  K
# e" F- S' t$ H6 M8 K  q5 }' W3 a
Stemcentrx为了配合药物的研发,他们将人类肿瘤移植到小鼠身上,这是非比寻常的一件事。在小鼠身上研究人类癌症要比研究培养的癌细胞昂贵多了。虽然这个体系很难建立,但是使用小鼠模型测试的药物,更有可能在人体起作用。他们告诉我,很多使用癌细胞研究抗癌药的试验,最终都失败了。他们这种尽全力降低意外事件发生的做法,让我们觉得Stemcentrx是一家有价值的公司。
: F6 H. K' r% }+ h2 n9 B
, |5 B3 c5 T4 R0 z公司的高估值会告诉想要投资的投资者什么?  m9 V  y, }1 k0 y

5 v, |1 a9 Q: l, F4 a0 `它会告诉你,这家公司对它的资本有很好的部署。而且,它的效率更高。Facebook现在市值超过2000亿美元,这是它融资总和的8到10倍。这是因为在某种程度上,他们会通过非常有效地投资扩大业务。但是,如果生物技术公司倾向于投资那些伪随机事件,那么大量的资金会被浪费。对于这种浪费,生物科技公司的标准借口是这样的,“我们不知道是否会成功,所以我们必须按这种方式做。”
' N! r6 c4 j: t0 W, s. N
: `( t+ y! G9 ]! \7 @( F  z* l( mStemcentrx是一家独立自主研发药物的公司。但是我们注意到,你也投资了 Emerald Therapeutics,这家公司有一个“云实验室”,所有人都可以通过它外包科学项目。这两个项目有没有矛盾呢?& J" r# `& I  A! K; s$ [

. X; |  p, o& m' s- N/ v实际上,有很多实验是可以外包的。但是,如果你想建立一家终端对终端的下一代制药公司,那么大部分的研究最好自己做。统筹不同部门业务这种能力在很多企业都被轻视。我认为Elon Musk在Tesla做的最好的事情,是自主完成各个阶段的生产装配。Tesla的很多竞争对手将核心部件的生产外包给别人,最终他们将死在这些外包上。
" x! y) W9 B6 d, U
1 Q4 c; a8 p# q- O% E; W1 W投资生物技术这类公司就需要面对统筹这种烦人且复杂的问题,你需要把方方面面都融合到一起。Stemcentrx的团队总是跟我们讲,“这些我们要自己做”。这是我想要分享的一种思维定式。在2012年我们投资了Stemcentrx之后,这个想法就深深的印在我的脑海中。我不想指名道姓,有些公司,在某些方面,这是他们失败的关键的因素。
- i' f' Z/ h5 o. B! L6 X2 z5 f% P" v- d8 F
现在有一个有趣的现象,有很多的科技企业纷纷进入生物科技领域。谷歌已经启动了一系列计划。你在长寿研究方面也有一些投资。你觉得是什么导致程序员涉足生物科技领域?
% a: M1 a* v8 f
" o& [5 N# r* y/ p从大处看,这个问题在于生命科学是否可以信息化。那些看上去混乱、完全随机的东西,能不能转换成更加确定可控的东西。
$ e/ r& w- U3 x# x9 F4 A: J' r
; w, Q1 I& Y9 z3 N9 O- o我认为,衰老,或者仅仅是死亡是随机事件导致的问题。你年纪越大,就会有越多的随机事件发生,你就会受到越多的伤害。即使不得癌症,你也有可能被陨石击中。因此,在一定程度上,技术是用来克服那些自然的随机性。把这个问题放在公司层面来讲的话,就是你在创建公司的过程中能不能摆脱随机性。但是从哲学的视角看待这个问题就是,我们是否从整体上摆脱随机性,并且克服自然随机性中恶的那一部分。
% [0 u: u* E+ d
0 o" U5 _  h8 J+ Q(责任编辑:jiyehui)
已有 2 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
细胞海洋 + 2 + 10 极好资料
hcoohboy + 2 + 10 极好资料

总评分: 威望 + 4  包包 + 20   查看全部评分

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
785 
威望
785  
包包
1506  

优秀版主 金话筒 优秀会员

藤椅
发表于 2015-9-19 11:00 |只看该作者
weinberg参股的verastem公司也拿到2亿美元风投做靶向肿瘤干细胞的临床试验
已有 1 人评分威望 包包 收起 理由
细胞海洋 + 2 + 10 欢迎参与讨论

总评分: 威望 + 2  包包 + 10   查看全部评分

‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册
验证问答 换一个

Archiver|干细胞之家 ( 吉ICP备2021004615号-3 )

GMT+8, 2025-5-3 08:31

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.