《Nature》：iPSC引发自体免疫排斥反应

JOEL

回复 hygene 的帖子
. g9 X& ?4 t7 g  m6 V2 R
. T' d! X) r; f% y2 }6 lYou are absolutely right!
' D% M! G% Q0 |) x" [9 nComparing with the mysteries, which has been set in "the great nature," the totality of human knowledge in the scientific exploration on the nature is just a sand of the seashore.
/ X( |  ]: c9 _9 q人类的科學探索精神總是崇高的。' D$ f# s  {7 J; \
但在伟大的造化之前人类最好應懐有一颗谦卑的心。仍需知道，全部的人类知識与尚未知的大自然的奥秘相比，诚如我所學得精辟中文成语所言乃是：九十牛一毛！

JOEL

回复 tpwang 的帖子7 {& Z$ `, W' k% j$ W" ~' ?

; e- U6 q" m5 K: y0 g% O------这个初步研究的另一个微妙结果是不同方法获得的iPSC似乎免疫反应程度不同。如果这是确实的，那么小分子、RNA以及半路转换（丁盛）方法是否也有这类问题，值得关注。反正是越搞越复杂了，正如 George Daley 说的，“我认为这一结果直指我们对这些细胞的了解是如何的肤浅的核心事实”I think it goes to the heart of the issue of how ignorant we really are in understanding these cells.”
9 v$ W: V0 u: j; i) i7 R# v. S. X0 ^' Q
! f$ }& n: I5 c$ P$ p! M------Appreciate the analysis, objective, and to the very point. Yes considering that the differences of the immunization rejection in various levels while observing the transplantation of the iPSs made in different methods, it shows that we still have hope on the track of iPS. So far, hard to foresee the fate of iPSs.