
- 积分
- 16
- 威望
- 16
- 包包
- 94
|
The key-point seems "the small-molecular factors" without cancer-caused risck, which are different from iPSC in the first generation. After all still:4 o0 T. A. x3 W. T' Y
I. Why the same story in the two sources, i.e. the CCTV Vedio and MNT, are different, one is 4 small molecular factors, the other, 7 ?/ J- q! Y8 E3 O2 N
II. "将這個(經诱導成體细胞獲得的CiPSc)细胞注入到小鼠的早期胚胎里" 獲得個體新生命---爲什麽還需要 "注入到小鼠的早期胚胎里" 才能獲得新生命?這表明CiPSc 的多能性,但這能表明是其本身已具全能性嗎?4 b( G+ l. e2 O
Thank you, any friends, for your further analysis. |
-
总评分: 威望 + 2
包包 + 10
查看全部评分
|