|
- 积分
- 17665
- 威望
- 17665
- 包包
- 23467
|
两篇俄国科学院物理学杂志上关于生命的review文章，供有兴趣的朋友参考。专注于具体方向研究的生物学家，也需要有更广阔的视野，并对生命本质及其哲学、物理和其他科学探索历史和现状有基本的了解。本站有朋友贴过E-薛定谔的经典文献What's life，这里的两篇2010年文章也有涉及。列出“内容”供参考。" P! z I1 r; L/ g! }0 M
! V8 U* H n8 l% d) bHow in the 20th century physicists, chemists and biologists answered the question: what is life?
. B; W/ }3 P5 x3 s9 R; W+ HV P Reutov, A N Schechter6 A5 X& }& F9 X" W, F: X
# y3 p3 F# [0 r$ m; V; s# h3 Z+ F' ?0 K! e# m7 O
7 R+ v7 |5 @0 G* y% O6 x( f
Contents
1 n$ z2 A2 _4 G8 W' D2 \! B# @- {- j: D
1. Introduction' n& E* G) h! N0 U* x) l% s
2. Main hypotheses concerning the origin of life on Earth# p+ V# N3 o: B* R: N
3. We have failed to uncover something of major importance E7 e2 `6 j' [2 t* J" s
4. How to close the gap between knowledge and understanding?! o1 V/ i- V3 r5 Q4 u
5. The data that served as the basis for the DNA model ! G% \7 z, K D* }' \+ j
6. The profound foresight of James Watson and Francis Crick
3 d8 T4 C' g8 ?7. Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin
! f9 _7 F9 Q: h: s2 N1 G6 }8. James Watson and Francis Crick
# Z( r, z1 n$ s( g- f0 E9. Is the knowledge of the DNA structure sufficient to answer the question `What is life'?
G% S& q% Q- \) i7 _' u10. N K Koltsov's idea of the matrix replication of biological molecules ! p( m$ S! H# F7 F# }
11. NWTimofeeff-Ressovsky's conclusion: a gene is a tiny compact structure " E: I9 W: I; N. j$ ~7 F; `
12. ``Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid''Ð a paper published in Nature
" h$ S+ T( M( {: N, g% }13. G A Gamow's idea of a universal code
: {0 r6 l L4 N/ i* y# Y! y8 \14. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962
) |# ?& w& ?. g6 l# k/ X2 q' f15. AMOlovnikov's idea of the role of telomeres in cell mitosis and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2009
2 s0 Q* q# D7 p) ]) I16. Prospects
; G6 ? q. |% [ y17. Conclusions
, f: f; t/ J* N; `6 m1 j18. Appendices
( Q& }( Q4 @& I& H+ k I. Rosalind Franklin: talent and fate; , g. p! I4 f0 n% F \5 O
II. James Watson, post-Nobel Prize; , j: u v% Z/ O8 c
III. Francis Crick, post-Nobel Prize;
: B# e/ N T* R9 b" e IV. James Watson's lectures in Moscow in 2008;
6 _4 Q# d: @3 Y, u7 ]. Q V. What conclusions can we draw after analyzing the history of the discovery of DNA and James Watson's lectures?
7 _% O/ K7 @9 E8 I/ o3 d
/ k; C2 Q; D( x1 x8 l% ~
9 P* V7 c% j( j! @& A21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?& W" T: U) Q0 d) ~( u
G R Ivanitskii
: @$ t/ `1 q0 H# d6 `6 T0 F1 u6 }: A. I, H @ O1 p) G
3 X8 u- o8 n# z. j- V
5 r% P* s3 Q: J! LContents
5 \2 R. B0 |# x9 M
" }' K* Y) \5 `5 K# _1. Introduction
! G1 J7 T3 V! x+ \% k2. Life. The problem of definition m1 O4 R, D3 c; q# L" g$ Z
2.1 The change in paradigm; ' [& N# m, m" m4 V. k @6 g
2.2 The advent of new biophysical sciences (genomics, proteomics, metabolics); : z6 B; {$ m' }9 r3 Y* C$ K1 k% O
2.3 The evolutionary history of living organisms at a molecular level;
3 ^: r5 K' ~ ~2 [+ Q 2.4 Identification of factors accelerating the evolution of living systems;
- ]) p* r6 z+ M2 q 2.5 Borderline between living and nonliving matter
; R* L& w% `4 M0 e( R3. Interplay between living and nonliving matter (ten paradoxes)
1 D, n* x& n1 ]3 x9 J 3.1 Plato±Socrates' paradox;
* B u7 w V; H: x: O 3.2 Zeno's paradox;
- r: u j/ K8 N' l$ T/ x 3.3 Maxwell's demon paradox; 5 K8 x7 W: z+ M7 v% }$ C9 `
3.4 Schrodinger's cat paradox;
( g# t G+ D& q4 ~$ \5 x* a- m' c 3.5 Stochastic ratchet paradox; 0 J' b) ?6 c( Y$ D
3.6 Paradox of time deficit; / g. I3 h M; n8 D L, Z( {
3.7 Paradox of homochiral structure; " m- i8 C# i& j+ S' i6 ^
3.8 Paradox of the part and the whole; ( m( P5 E/ @/ \' B" g7 s
3.9 Saint Petersburg paradox;
, X M! }) T( R P& r 3.10 Buridan's ass paradox
- e6 ~5 l" V" ^2 @, R1 D& X; h( ^4. Discussion! y7 q# x) r2 P y5 @8 c7 t1 Q* p
5. Conclusion
* c4 N0 p& E5 D3 u" GReferences# K5 e* A& y9 o3 I
6 g w9 ~) F& G; M
|
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 威望 + 11
包包 + 22
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2011-3-10 16:51
谢谢！
