|
- 积分
- 17665
- 威望
- 17665
- 包包
- 23467
|
两篇俄国科学院物理学杂志上关于生命的review文章，供有兴趣的朋友参考。专注于具体方向研究的生物学家，也需要有更广阔的视野，并对生命本质及其哲学、物理和其他科学探索历史和现状有基本的了解。本站有朋友贴过E-薛定谔的经典文献What's life，这里的两篇2010年文章也有涉及。列出“内容”供参考。
& D( O1 K( U3 I( \! S
8 Q2 L0 e$ B3 ^+ b0 FHow in the 20th century physicists, chemists and biologists answered the question: what is life?
. q5 n- i% v+ Y, c0 `) t* o- }- Q6 xV P Reutov, A N Schechter- P' P3 j" n0 s& @1 e4 {# Q1 e v
) Y* s8 z; i) i7 h; j4 |8 s- |, R! R G$ h* n1 t9 U0 X
6 y& J& O# F8 C5 s# X |
Contents
6 f9 l" j8 z7 \
& C/ d- Z. I) ?1. Introduction
/ _, e( }+ @! o/ F; I. K/ X" q2. Main hypotheses concerning the origin of life on Earth: }/ m) X2 s+ \: O- A) C5 z* C$ \
3. We have failed to uncover something of major importance
2 y5 |& M; `, _; a# g( k4. How to close the gap between knowledge and understanding?
* F. M: n* ]* B! U% [5. The data that served as the basis for the DNA model
" r, U0 p+ i7 A" [: ^6. The profound foresight of James Watson and Francis Crick
6 k& r7 \+ @0 J8 s" q! h7. Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin8 q; e g9 f* r
8. James Watson and Francis Crick
2 T6 p o+ _4 {8 C9. Is the knowledge of the DNA structure sufficient to answer the question `What is life'? ' j2 q9 } M% C' k. c8 ^) y
10. N K Koltsov's idea of the matrix replication of biological molecules
( n' R0 z, E8 Y ]. ?* G# _11. NWTimofeeff-Ressovsky's conclusion: a gene is a tiny compact structure
0 j4 t7 `. d6 x9 v; ^12. ``Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid''Ð a paper published in Nature
7 v; c7 D2 O! q1 P7 X3 l l0 H$ t13. G A Gamow's idea of a universal code3 s1 J5 w- l) C
14. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962
9 w7 G, @( T }1 ~8 I+ O% X5 D15. AMOlovnikov's idea of the role of telomeres in cell mitosis and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 20092 Y+ p4 N: D6 f$ b) R- B
16. Prospects- ^" L5 ]% q! I
17. Conclusions& _0 F5 t: k1 |) E
18. Appendices
6 B: K# h& g% \ I. Rosalind Franklin: talent and fate; 9 N p. c& b& Z" a" H, |
II. James Watson, post-Nobel Prize;
6 U) }/ b& b' k0 S6 _ III. Francis Crick, post-Nobel Prize; 6 ^1 O% ?" d0 l0 s
IV. James Watson's lectures in Moscow in 2008; + X, r: M+ a$ s3 ]" U& r
V. What conclusions can we draw after analyzing the history of the discovery of DNA and James Watson's lectures?
2 W+ T8 r3 I/ y4 w
1 W! h. J3 k9 a" y- I3 H
l* p( t/ O0 t+ M: }: o21st century: what is life from the perspective of physics?6 D- ~" R% L& M7 X- \% |0 ~$ `
G R Ivanitskii* h% {0 |! \& t
0 i' S' c7 S) W$ {8 J, {' H
i5 q) M! q" `, t& \: X: a# S3 N. R8 P% F- J& M6 j2 e
Contents
: J# A. \$ h3 B+ d3 ^, m4 k* ^5 O
( q! N7 o3 k0 t4 c1 q1. Introduction
# K4 x! [) @# M0 Y8 M% W; z2. Life. The problem of definition
3 H" Q1 Q/ k+ W$ M2 w+ J L$ r 2.1 The change in paradigm;
8 e3 V% ^# d! Z 2.2 The advent of new biophysical sciences (genomics, proteomics, metabolics); 8 _" x: }% r* x! Q* U
2.3 The evolutionary history of living organisms at a molecular level; $ ^$ [, A& G% O a- G2 E
2.4 Identification of factors accelerating the evolution of living systems; % p! ?5 h$ H8 b
2.5 Borderline between living and nonliving matter* |6 k7 Q" q/ X9 E" B% t( a
3. Interplay between living and nonliving matter (ten paradoxes)
0 Y' [2 a7 v- }' }4 A 3.1 Plato±Socrates' paradox;
% g# V p, E) g) Z 3.2 Zeno's paradox;
+ R" a* r5 w8 ? G4 u 3.3 Maxwell's demon paradox;
) o' I' b- n( I: o, V: {8 U 3.4 Schrodinger's cat paradox;9 Q8 T( {3 w+ z0 w9 R- H5 o
3.5 Stochastic ratchet paradox; 8 U" N1 `4 H( l- W+ p# }8 l1 w# S5 h
3.6 Paradox of time deficit;
9 W+ O. @/ c/ Z# M& F 3.7 Paradox of homochiral structure; 9 m# A# J7 ^8 B4 ^+ @
3.8 Paradox of the part and the whole;
( _. d* r6 M3 z+ z+ `2 | 3.9 Saint Petersburg paradox; + M/ |) s; u9 n$ M' [2 Y
3.10 Buridan's ass paradox& F$ v; r" F0 l- j
4. Discussion& p1 _6 A8 R; x$ q. `4 r0 L* C
5. Conclusion! W1 V1 x, `- F% T. |
References9 w0 g' b6 |2 ~6 q4 q
% r* s) A6 R) e6 U" t$ }
|
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 威望 + 11
包包 + 22
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2011-3-10 16:51
谢谢！
