|
  
- 积分
- 0
- 威望
- 0
- 包包
- 3465
|
a Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1) x2 {9 i1 }0 L- n2 i% k
8 q5 a4 G4 Q7 @1 [7 c& V
Correspondence to: Brian Burke, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada T2N 4N1. Tel:(403) 220-7287 Fax:(403) 270-0979 E-mail:bburke@ucalgary.ca.
" I5 |" e; b) X0 z$ L) e% j0 H, g/ O6 \4 }8 G' _- @ F& `
The nuclear lamina is a thin (20 nm) yet insoluble protein meshwork that, in higher cells, lines the nucleoplasmic face of the nuclear envelope (NE).1 The lamina is intimately associated with both the inner nuclear membrane and underlying chromatin, while at the same time providing anchoring sites for nuclear pore complexes (Gerace and Burke 1988 ). Because of these extensive interactions, the lamina has long been considered to play an important role in the maintenance of nuclear architecture. This notion has been lent considerable weight in recent years by the findings that lamina and NE defects are linked to a number of human diseases (Wilson 2000 ). Steen and Collas 2001 (this issue) now provide some tantalizing data that links nuclear lamina organization to cell survival.* w" H, I3 `# @& _7 G
0 f9 l; v5 V1 S' O8 s( O) p% |The major components of the nuclear lamina are the A- and B-type lamins. These are intermediate filament protein family members (Stuurman et al. 1998 ) that feature a central coiled-coil flanked by nonhelical head and tail domains. In mammalian somatic cells, there are four major lamins, A, B1, B2, and C. The B-type lamins are encoded by separate genes (LMNB1 and LMNB2) and, as a class, are found in the nuclei of all mammalian somatic cells. Lamins A and C, in contrast, arise through alternative splicing of the same primary transcript encoded by the LMNA gene, expression of which is developmentally regulated. In the mouse, lamins A and C are absent from the early embryo and only appear later during development (Stewart and Burke 1987 ; Roeber et al. 1989 ). Indeed, some cell types never express A-type lamins. Clearly then, A-type lamins are not strictly required for the formation of a nuclear lamina and NE. However, neither are they entirely dispensable. While ablation of the LMNA gene in mice causes no overt developmental abnormalities, it does lead to seriously retarded postnatal growth linked to cardiomyopathy and muscular dystrophy (Sullivan et al. 1999 ). This phenotype is associated with large-scale changes in nuclear architecture. Similar effects have been observed in both Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans, where changes in lamin expression lead to gross nuclear structural abnormalities (Lenz-Bohme et al. 1997 ; Liu et al. 2000 ). In humans, defects in the LMNA gene have now been linked to forms of muscular dystrophy and cardiomyopathy as well as to partial lipodystrophy, a disorder affecting adipocyte function (Cohen et al. 2001 ).6 x8 J, W% O/ ~* |
( L) h& @, [8 y3 P+ W" CDuring mitosis in higher cells, the NE must be disassembled for the condensed chromosomes to gain access to the mitotic spindle (Moir et al. 2000a ). Disassembly of the lamina is initiated by phosphorylation of S and T residues at either end of the lamin coiled-coil domain (Heald and McKeon 1990 ; Peter et al. 1990 ; Ward and Kirschner 1990 ). This eventually leads to dispersal of A- and B-type lamin homooligomers throughout the mitotic cell (Gerace and Blobel 1980 ). In telophase, the dispersed lamins are recycled to form NEs in each daughter cell. Steen et al. 2000 have previously shown that reassembly of B-type lamins is under the control of both protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and an A-kinase anchoring protein, AKAP149. The latter is a membrane protein localized to both the ER and nuclear membranes, and contains a specific binding site for PP1. During mitosis, PP1 appears largely chromatin bound, but in telophase it is recruited to the nuclear periphery to dephosphorylate B-type lamins and thereby enable polymerization and lamina assembly. Steen et al. 2000 have demonstrated in vitro that PP1 targeting to the NE involves binding to AKAP149. If this binding is inhibited using a short peptide corresponding to the AKAP149 PP1-binding domain (PP1-BD), then PP1 recruitment to the nuclear periphery does not occur and B-type lamin assembly is effectively abolished. A control peptide containing a V to A substitution has no effect on this process. This model (Fig 1) predicts that B-type lamins can only polymerize after the reforming nuclear membranes reassociate with chromatin, since membranes are needed to provide AKAP149 activity. In fact, lagging assembly of B-type lamins has been reported in studies using green fluorescent protein–tagged lamin B (Moir et al. 2000b ).
7 H8 C! Y! F* I
1 P% f+ }0 G6 {0 IFigure 1. The proposed roles of PP1 in nuclear lamina reformation. In mitotic telophase, PP1 is recruited to the nuclear periphery (1) via its interaction with AKAP149, a step that is blocked by PP1-BD. PP1 then dephosphorylates B-type lamins (2), allowing them to assemble (3). Disassembled B-type lamins are depicted as predominantly membrane associated during mitosis. (?) Phosphorylated sites within lamin B.1 m) m% A3 [6 Q7 N
P" i" `# p; y# U
Steen and Collas 2001 have now extended these studies to include intact cells. The approach taken was to employ lipid micelles to introduce either inhibitory or control peptides into HeLa cells arrested in mitosis. Their remarkable results have implications for apoptosis (programmed cell death), as well as nuclear assembly. After introduction of PP1-BD and subsequent release from mitosis, they observed that association of PP1 with the nuclear envelope was blocked and there was a profound inhibition of B-type lamin reassembly. At the same time, A-type lamin assembly was unaffected and a NE still formed. These results exactly match their earlier in vitro data. However, in PP1-BD–treated cells that entered early G1, B-type lamins were rapidly degraded in a caspase-dependent manner. Inhibition of caspase activity revealed that the bulk of the lamin B (both B1 and B2) was mislocalized to the cytoplasm, excluding the trivial possibility that failure to incorporate lamin B into the nuclear lamina was due to lamin degradation. Other NE proteins, including A-type lamins and both emerin and lamin B receptor (two integral inner nuclear membrane proteins), remained intact and were correctly localized in the presence of PP1-BD. However, 6 h after release from mitosis, proteolysis of these proteins commenced. This was accompanied by DNA and nuclear fragmentation and the appearance of highly condensed chromatin, all hallmarks of apoptosis. Thus, PP1-BD treatment of cells before exit from mitosis elicited a delayed apoptotic response. Steen and Collas 2001 speculate that the failure to assemble B-type lamins directly triggers apoptosis, although an additional PP1-dependent process unrelated to lamin assembly cannot yet be ruled out. This is clearly an issue that needs to be addressed.4 R% {9 v, G) A: x
/ i; }0 Z- K# t- CSince a NE does assemble in PP1-BD–treated HeLa cells, there can be at best only a minimal requirement for B-type lamins in this process. To determine whether a lamina was required at all for NE reformation, Steen and Collas 2001 examined the effects of PP1-BD on KE37 lymphoblasts, a cell type that does not express A-type lamins. As in HeLa cells, PP1-BD blocked lamin B reassembly during telophase, and the lymphoblasts underwent apoptosis 6 h later. Then came a surprise: when they labeled the KE37 cells with antibodies against lamins A and C they found both of these proteins to be present at the nuclear periphery of those cells that had received PP1-BD, but not in cells treated with the control peptide! It would appear that failure to recruit PP1 to the nuclear periphery at the end of mitosis resulted in the induction of A-type lamin synthesis! Although yet to be demonstrated conclusively, this effect is likely attributable to the inhibition of B-type lamin assembly. It is as if the cell attempts to compensate for failure to assemble B-type lamins by upregulating A-type lamin expression. However, this is ultimately a futile exercise since the cells are committed to apoptosis. This is the first example of LMNA gene activation outside the context of differentiation. The implication is that lamin gene expression may be regulated by the assembly state of the nuclear lamina and/or by unassembled lamin proteins.
) h: z% A+ v2 I! R1 f1 N' r5 [1 x2 ~2 v6 T9 `
The last few years have witnessed a surge of interest in the biology of the NE driven in part by the findings that several human diseases are linked to defects in both the LMNA and emerin genes. It has become increasingly clear that the nuclear lamina plays a key role in maintenance not only of nuclear envelope integrity but of nuclear architecture as a whole (Cohen et al. 2001 ). Loss of lamin gene expression has been linked to gross changes in nuclear shape and redistribution of heterochromatin (Sullivan et al. 1999 ). These findings, plus lamin interactions with transcriptional repressors such as Rb, further suggest that lamins could potentially modify global patterns of transcription (Cohen et al. 2001 ). Now Steen and Collas 2001 have provided some compelling evidence for a link between lamin B status and the induction of LMNA expression. In cells programmed to die, caspase-dependent degradation of lamins has been recognized as a prelude to nuclear destruction (Lazebnik et al. 1995 ). This new work further suggests that not only is lamin degradation a feature of apoptosis, but that failure to correctly assemble a nuclear lamina is actually a trigger of apoptosis. Clearly, there is still a lot we have to learn about nuclear lamin function. D, w: t2 }% L2 i, a' o9 x; L
: }# V! D0 D# p/ L5 {. D6 UReferences
; Z3 ^& H6 Y4 h3 v, k% e; E8 J
9 r! m4 ~- V: ]( ICohen, M., Lee, K.K., Wilson, K.L., and Gruenbaum, Y. 2001. Transcriptional repression, apoptosis, human disease and the functional evolution of the nuclear lamina. Trends Biochem. Sci 26:41-47.
0 k7 Z4 d' x+ S7 C7 B$ S% H6 G1 s' h- }1 U* ~& F
Gerace, L., and Blobel, G. 1980. The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell 19:277-287.
$ f) s% B: r0 X1 D d2 q' U! D6 e: w1 H* @* u/ r
Gerace, L., and Burke, B. 1988. Functional organization of the nuclear envelope. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4:335-374.
; Q; n6 Z8 V+ ?# e1 \3 w0 r: m. `# v% y! W' K
Heald, R., and McKeon, F. 1990. Mutations of phosphorylation sites in lamin A that prevent nuclear lamina disassembly in mitosis. Cell 61:579-589.
5 i1 y5 J" x% d1 v# @9 b+ y
/ r% [' Y/ ]& O- v- nLazebnik, Y., Takahashi, A., Moir, R., Goldman, R., Poirier, G., Kaufmann, S., and Earnshaw, W. 1995. Studies of the lamin proteinase reveal multiple parallel biochemical pathways during apoptotic execution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9042-9046.$ b$ ?! k1 b c/ d! }$ ^$ H! N
: y) w" R' J" wLenz-B?hme, B., Wismar, J., Fuchs, S., Reifegerste, R., Buchner, E., Betz, H., and Schmitt, B. 1997. Insertional mutation of the Drosophila nuclear lamin Dm0 gene results in defective nuclear envelopes, clustering of nuclear pore complexes, and accumulation of annulate lamellae. J. Cell Biol. 137:1001-1016.
# ~$ Y: u$ c' X9 C) D
( F! E8 F" ~) J+ w) rLiu, J., Ben-Shahar, T.R., Riemer, D., Treinin, M., Spann, P., Weber, K., Fire, A., and Gruenbaum, Y. 2000. Essential roles for Caenorhabditis elegans lamin gene in nuclear organization, cell cycle progression, and spatial organization of nuclear pore complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:3937-3947.+ F- A+ N, I/ } z1 v$ O' g/ R3 E
$ h4 R4 @, w9 [6 P9 z
Moir, R.D., Spann, T.P., Lopez-Soler, R.I., Yoon, M., Goldman, A.E., Khuon, S., and Goldman, R.D. 2000a. Review: the dynamics of the nuclear lamins during the cell cycle〞relationship between structure and function. J. Struct. Biol 129:324-334.( {4 \+ v0 k# Z
9 }. V; W7 R% a8 \
Moir, R.D., Yoon, M., Khuon, S., and Goldman, R.D. 2000b. Nuclear lamins A and B1: different pathways of assembly during nuclear envelope formation in living cells. J. Cell Biol 151:1155-1168.
' Q m# Q u2 |: P9 }+ Z- u+ Y- s9 m5 H, A
Peter, M., Nakagawa, J., Dorée, M., Labbé, J.C., and Nigg, E.A. 1990. In vitro disassembly of the nuclear lamina and M phase–specific phosphorylation of lamins by cdc2 kinase. Cell 61:591-602.6 W: x, B5 ?' s7 M8 v$ s
, c7 i! m% ?! n! _4 d0 m
Roeber, R.-A., Weber, K., and Osborn, M. 1989. Differential timing of lamin A/C expression in the various organs of the mouse embryo and the young animal: a developmental study. Development (Camb.) 105:365-378.. O g% D) m9 m% l/ e3 A$ T/ \
; @, Y& O. B* k) v0 g' [7 g
Steen, R.L., and Collas, P. 2001. Mistargeting of B-type lamins at the end of mitosis: implications on cell survival and regulation of lamins A/C expression. J. Cell Biol. 153:621-626.- i' Q) n2 N& x6 t- |
& v e5 Z6 }) k+ Z% P9 R; Z' \
Steen, R.L., Martins, S.B., Tasken, K., and Collas, P. 2000. Recruitment of protein phosphatase 1 to the nuclear envelope by A-kinase anchoring protein AKAP149 is a prerequisite for nuclear lamina assembly. J. Cell Biol 150:1251-1262.
# p! l/ y, b. ]& c
& |3 | I0 R$ g% Z' ^4 l- }/ W% vStewart, C., and Burke, B. 1987. Teratocarcinoma stem cells and early mouse embryos contain only a single major lamin polypeptide closely resembling lamin B. Cell 51:383-392.
# M6 @. N% Y& N7 J* I: V4 a) S- B2 T' `& \' v/ h) o, t
Stuurman, N., Heins, S., and Aebi, U. 1998. Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions. J. Struct. Biol. 122:42-66.; z- Z5 k# a: X! \' U
% f1 M! S/ A! `/ q
Sullivan, T., Escalante-Alcalde, D., Bhatt, H., Anver, M., Bhat, N., Nagashima, K., Stewart, C.L., and Burke, B. 1999. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol 147:913-920.8 B# a3 v- \- s
. D* m+ A' a1 E; R, p. W& WWard, G.E., and Kirschner, M.W. 1990. Identification of cell-cycle regulated phosphorylation sites on nuclear lamin C. Cell 61:561-577.
# s% \& b; }$ L
+ [4 b7 Y; K7 Q& t! `) VWilson, K.L. 2000. The nuclear envelope, muscular dystrophy and gene expression. Trends Cell Biol 10:125-129.(Brian Burkea) |
|
发表于 2009-3-5 23:37
发表于 2015-6-12 13:33
