|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑 : _$ m4 x- \, s4 y
* l8 e1 y+ C* k6 C6 @: U" iThe first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on
( r8 C+ \: N( OClimate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science
# r6 Q6 D. Q; t) l4 k2 {of global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week." ~9 e/ [7 E/ e/ g: |$ Z
This will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;
/ ^, V3 I" ^/ Esome 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things5 x, x! `/ P( z+ D( o, S
have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to0 N5 @ o7 \! S+ [, S0 S" x) J
rethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from
( R0 S! y3 f1 r! K4 mall who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but
, r3 C9 M' m% f" n3 cthe current report should be its last mega-assessment.
: T" M" F8 H4 u- Y2 h+ G9 \% k" V
& q$ I6 D3 X. j
( z Q' V. Q d
0 I, a2 V t5 A: t, R) \: w5 ?2 c
- r$ b4 `9 z$ q4 z0 H6 C. n& p/ U6 {- \0 W) G, y Y: f& x
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-22 14:40
发表于 2013-9-25 00:24
