|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑
' w# l. a$ J. H* B5 P& a2 w: M
+ i. Y* W& M# k$ wThe first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on
0 T5 g& `/ l, w4 y% g( K X$ hClimate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science) X# m# H5 E' K9 g
of global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week.
2 C# g' ~* S$ {, B1 i' q- XThis will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;
9 \- ?; n3 I' j- b1 @some 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things
+ X# \5 G3 a0 [1 _# j+ }have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to% \' t& N0 h8 d
rethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from
9 v5 c ~+ M; U1 {% nall who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but
8 H7 s! B0 t% P! Q2 {& \. Rthe current report should be its last mega-assessment.
" }! d( X$ U3 [, E# i( b8 N9 b) ~) h+ R ^2 Y$ E7 z @
C; u" k& ?7 i* p0 \) t$ ]. f3 Q) N- d( S
1 T$ g8 w1 v2 {/ |' O: i. w8 V
1 i7 }- }2 j D( h% k4 @; K* S& b, L8 f3 X5 f0 u% Q" g% Z$ x
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-22 14:40
发表于 2013-9-25 00:24
