|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-23 08:41 编辑
4 V$ Z9 Z4 _# I( h: M6 t: D) R; N) U7 v; o7 h2 w1 E
The first working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on
( {, k! F' l! W' P3 y: ? ?( PClimate Change (IPCC) will deliver its assessment of the science3 T' s p' @9 @0 l: u
of global warming at a meeting in Stockholm next week.
. Z5 G1 _: ^* b$ qThis will be the fifth time that the IPCC has delivered such an assessment;5 Q, T! t* h! g$ M" s, ~9 M
some 23 years have passed since the first effort. Many things
% R& @) S6 O) T" U1 }have changed in that time; others have not. Regardless, it is time to
9 X5 F9 v) c* L. m& Urethink the IPCC. The organization deserves thanks and respect from7 N+ {4 P4 h5 Z% G* C% p) M
all who care about the principle of evidence-based policy-making, but
8 F0 } ?" k0 P9 u. w( K( W4 l: @the current report should be its last mega-assessment.
; [9 h9 z- r9 ]8 \4 @! _' e3 `5 `5 V5 P
% K2 K# {9 G* b6 h; _% T& J' L# j/ G
$ B6 Y4 p: t c1 {1 u, L8 E9 ~
' O; p* A3 J1 q+ K( n" [/ O0 b2 b
) _8 s* r$ s- l8 Z: O
: r/ I" X+ T# M4 }) y
|
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-22 14:40
发表于 2013-9-25 00:24
