![Rank: 3](static/image/common/star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 3](static/image/common/star_level1.gif)
- 积分
- 416
- 威望
- 416
- 包包
- 1859
|
![](data/attachment/common/cf/144223pa4p1kxfx2gz1ezk.jpg)
How to Read a Scientific Paper / s7 w( u! _8 M
Five Helpful Questions
- Z7 T7 F: r5 D3 ~! i$ \1. WHY did they do this set of experiments? + g* V [+ D* t$ y) @% r/ L
A. What are the authors trying to settle, prove or demolish? 8 G* T3 Z. U. T: C3 B( I. R0 j
B. How did this issue come up?
5 V4 w1 I1 e; S( ZC. Why is it worth the effort to settle this issue? , _9 Z9 h) X8 ]0 [+ q2 q
& F9 M+ s5 ~0 G2. HOW were the experiments actually done?
1 v5 e3 S3 q& E/ A% h7 F2 ]. @% ^A. What number or quantity was actually measured? . X# u2 \+ l) `. ]/ ^5 Y
B. How was the number in A obtained, i.e. what did they actually do? A flow diagram of
- `$ F+ w# O, |7 P; `their procedure is usually helpful. - e% ^: f( D- k* G# T
C. What numbers are really wanted, i.e., must be calculated?
- b j) v6 C }* ?, ?0 \. c- Q# B" J+ vD. What information is necessary to calculate the numbers in C, and where did they get 0 @' l8 X- W$ U" g" e
this information (from a table, experimental control, or “common knowledge?’). t, P# B3 b! ?3 B
% R& Q/ p2 [( |' b2 @3. WHAT are the results? $ K- o1 \" e: B$ D5 i4 \
What is the translation into English of the data in their figures, tables and/or pictures?
: C A `9 {2 Z, N1 I yThe additional Q “How do you actually calculate the numbers wanted in C?’ is implicit in the
8 q! C0 |1 e* H4 X+ y l$ Kone. You may want to make this into a separate, explicit Q (2E).
" E& _& ?2 _' T C v(This is really a translation of the conclusions and not the results.) For now overlook the
% w5 e) F% c; H! ^' w$ Udistinction between the results and the (obvious) conclusions in the answer to this question 6 Z) ~4 K! A$ @$ U: Y5 [
because we have found that it is not worthwhile to stress this issue at the beginning of the
. u$ ?8 j* {1 Wterm while the students are still struggling with Q 1 and 2. Q 4, which is specifically # d1 u1 U% }6 N3 W3 Q( ?! l
designed to emphasize this issue is introduced as soon as the students learn how to answer : w6 N9 U* C8 O+ o+ o; B
Q 1-3. . V9 Z: W$ X. @( b$ p- {% W
4. WHAT can conclude from the results? (Assume for the time being, that you can take the
- O) h) a7 c; I7 |- o# Nresults at face value – in other words, assume they did both the experiments and 0 k! m5 e! s9 \+ `+ H3 g
calculations correctly. Whether or not they really “did it right” is Q5.).
! [; G! e% ?6 V4 t3 Y7 p0 Q5 cA. Do the results support the stated conclusion or interpretation of the authors?
5 ] `2 P0 H! d0 \9 yB. Do the results prove the stated conclusion, i.e., do they rule out any of the stated or
, Y1 |' L2 s' t0 V6 m7 o! Hunstated alternatives? To check this point considers what the figures and tables would
$ f/ i" u4 s; Y( `8 z% {1 nlook like if an alternative interpretation were correct. Could you really tell the difference? $ e" G& z3 e7 H8 k5 k
/ K+ x' V0 _6 V5. (WHETHER) Did they do everything correctly? # O" t, ]( S7 E9 C9 g) R3 c. j! F4 N% e
A. Could anything be wrong with their experimental methods? 2 s# x/ x' V6 n e/ R
B. Could anything be wrong with their theoretical methods?
{7 W7 K( _. j! x5 A(Did they use the right formulas, make reasonable assumptions, etc.?)
4 d; f. I3 A, }7 O( H0 p $ `+ g4 N' ^% K0 \
|
|