 
- 积分
- 773
- 威望
- 773
- 包包
- 1251
|

Nanog is cloned by Smith A and Yamanaka S' groups almost at the same time in 2003 (two cell papers). Smith A's group also studied Oct4 () and BMP(). The question is about a recent cell paper by Smith A's group in Cell. According the that paper: "Nanog can command constitutive self-renewal of ES cells (Chambers et al., 2003) and appears able to reverse precommitment; E# R# y8 ?* y7 i2 k1 k" c" l
perturbations of the pluripotent state. Nanog also greatly increases the efficiency of nuclear reprogramming by
: [& _ G& e7 N' lES cell fusion. It is therefore somewhat surprising that Nanog is not represented among the minimal combinations of exogenous factors found to convert mouse somatic cells into iPS cells. This study offers an explanation. Our results indicate4 v5 h9 [3 l2 u$ n! ^: D! l
that Nanog is in fact decisive for attaining this pluripotent ground state. However, this requirement is during the final phase of reprogramming when other key factors are already present and may be fulfilled by activation of endogenous Nanog. A role in7 T; z3 d& w/ S
the culmination of somatic cell reprogramming is mirrored by the pivotal function revealed for Nanog in establishing pluripotency6 D8 ?! T' V7 X# Z) w/ n% t
in the embryo."$ b) \& J( O( g/ h2 g
Hope those papers are helpful to understand the background information for discussion. |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册
-
总评分: 威望 + 10
包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|