干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站

 

 

搜索
朗日生物

免疫细胞治疗专区

欢迎关注干细胞微信公众号

  
查看: 376175|回复: 226
go

The Caudal-Related Protein Cdx2 Promotes Trophoblast Differentiation of Mouse Em [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
威望
0  
包包
483  
楼主
发表于 2009-3-5 00:14 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
作者:Elena Tolkunovaa, Fatima Cavalerib, Sigrid Eckardtc, Rolland Reinboldb, Lane K. Christensond, Hans R. Schlerb, Alexey Tomilina作者单位:a Department of Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology, Freiburg, Germany;b Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Mnster, Germany;c Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, New Bolton Center, University of Pe
& u2 s  j# N' N8 P9 k6 m                  4 h1 s1 E9 `- s2 m% G
                  4 o+ J  }7 @" W  w
          9 p# X, |$ D5 M5 N7 x
                         . J, _2 h0 ~3 x) a, {
            3 E$ ~! X7 }: A6 q3 ?, ]3 V* Y) k& M
            
) a' E# X5 g7 e7 u4 t) v            6 W! U8 Z% ~+ [) D3 B2 f
            
7 Y6 z6 j8 G) V4 F/ R4 _( N: F                     
1 ], y# J* O+ D4 X- t6 W$ ]0 ~  m        
1 w8 c6 A* P* Q" [6 \          i4 ^  o9 B( J/ Q$ h6 i) \8 y* z
        
$ m, ^8 w6 J* _/ N, X- Z8 |2 R          【摘要】# h$ w+ |8 m- b6 _
      Besides holding great promise in clinics, embryonic stem (ES) cells represent a valuable tool for studying regulation of early developmental processes, such as cell differentiation in preimplantation embryos. The caudal-related homeobox protein Cdx2 is a transcriptional regulator essential for trophoblast lineage, functioning as early as implantation. Using an inducible system, we show that gain of Cdx2 function in ES cells triggers trophoblast-like morphological differentiation, accompanied by ploidy increase, onset of expression of trophoblast-specific markers, and loss of pluripotency-associated gene expression. These data provide an insight into the genetic network that controls lineage specification and functioning in early mammalian development.
+ E5 `" G: v# F: O: ]2 o          【关键词】 Embryonic stem cells Cdx Oct Preimplantation development Trophoblast
/ o" @, E2 E; i7 `: t& a8 Z                  INTRODUCTION# U5 _) @, f- c' N
( _! E/ J+ \! X7 E
During mouse preimplantation development, the fertilized oocyte undergoes several successive cleavages to form, by 2.5 days post coitum (dpc), a compacted cluster of approximately 32 cells, called morula. The latter further undergoes spatial reorganization to form the early blastocyst (3.5 dpc) with epithelial-like trophectoderm (TE) cells embedding the blastocoel cavity and inner cell mass (ICM). By the time of implantation (4.5¨C5 dpc), the ICM differentiates into the epiblast and overlying primitive endoderm (PE). After implantation, the epiblast-contacting TE (polar TE) gives rise to the trophoblast tissues of conceptus, the PE gives rise to the visceral and parietal endoderm, and the epiblast gives rise to the three germ layers of fetus and the extraembryonic mesoderm (reviewed in ).: o  R# i$ h6 ~' k1 j( E1 c* [

; ^) t$ J/ s* y2 |Lineage tracing and transplantation studies provided important clues about the timing of specification of the three blastocyst lineages. PE precursor cells appear to be set aside in the ICM as early as 3.5 dpc . A plausible model is that direct genetic interactions between these and other transcriptional regulators, superimposed by the outer-versus-inner positioning within the embryo, play decisive roles in the specification and maintenance of these first lineages.
8 g2 P6 U- E: W& Q, o) Q/ k  R7 c- f# b: d
The caudal-related homeobox protein Cdx2 is the earliest trophoblast-specific transcription factor reported to date. The onset of Cdx2 protein expression takes place in the outer cells of the compacted 16-cell morula at approximately 2.5 dpc, thus marking the prospective TE, and persists in both polar and mural TE of 3.5- to 4.5-dpc blastocysts , albeit on a different genetic background, did not show obvious defects in the TE: In most Cdx2 null embryos, the TE segregated from the ICM and maintained its epithelial integrity properly at least until 4.5 dpc and also expressed a typical TE marker, EndoA (unpublished data). In both cases, however, Cdx2 null mutants neither implanted into uteri nor produced TE outgrowths in culture, and derivation of trophoblast stem (TS) thereof repeatedly failed. Thus, though the role of Cdx2 in the initial TE specification remains uncertain, its indispensability for proper functioning and/or maintenance of trophoblast lineage, as early as the time of implantation, is explicit.; A$ o# ~4 A  b3 `; y% \" l; r0 H

$ G+ `: H9 o* K- g7 P; Z5 R( w* z5 c, ZICM-derived embryonic stem (ES) cells have virtually unlimited self-renewal potential in vitro and are referred to as pluripotent due to their unique ability of multilineage differentiation in culture or upon reintroduction into preimplantation embryos . This is likely to reflect the origin of ES cells, the epiblast, which is the lineage that is fully segregated from TE and PE.
3 v6 R' j$ t* R2 F! B$ ^3 a" i3 ~' P4 \9 o7 U. S- I3 B
This TE/PE-prohibited ES cell¨Cdifferentiation potential, however, can be diverted by altering gene expression programs. For instance, a forced expression of GATA4 or GATA6, over-expression of Oct4, and genetic ablation of Nanog function have been shown to promote ES cell differentiation into PE-like cells .
, ^- l  Z# s, C4 }" [7 [( T6 g* O+ `% \4 y- i' v6 A7 D
In this report, we show that forced expression of the earliest trophoblast-specific regulator Cdx2 can also promote differentiation of ES cells into trophoblast-like cells. We discuss the possible role of Cdx2 and the mechanism of its action in vivo.
: a0 X7 x2 u/ V$ u& z2 ^3 L5 X3 E4 F# W
MATERIALS AND METHODS9 ]7 b/ P9 Z1 c$ f! ]0 a4 G4 e2 S
$ X. u; _  m  p* |+ h6 p9 Z; U
See Supplementary Information available online.
9 R4 A( [* `; x, E* F! d5 k7 W( E% v( y2 k# u) G+ d, z
RESULTS
$ q1 ~  y' ~7 h$ q- v* h, J( H
- ^) A  h) @& q8 q# I' u" B- Z' S! |We have examined whether forced expression of the key trophoblast-specific transcription factor Cdx2 can divert the fate of ES cells. To this end, a transgenic ES cell line that constitutively expressed a fusion between the full-length Cdx2 protein and the mutated ligand-binding domain of the glucorticoid receptor (GR*) was generated (Fig. 1A). Expression of the fusion transcripts was driven by the ubiquitous chicken ß-actin promoter and by the cytomegalovirus enhancer (CX). The nuclear translocation of GR*Cdx2 fusion protein could be effectively controlled by adding the synthetic ligand dexamethasone (DEX) to the culture media (Fig. 3C and data not shown). Consistent with the function of Cdx2 as a nuclear transcription factor, we observed no effect of GR*Cdx2 protein which was mainly cytoplasm-confined in the absence of DEX. On the contrary, upon DEX-induced translocation of GR*Cdx2 into the nucleus, the ES cells underwent drastic morphological changes. The growth rate of the cells became slower, and colonies progressively compacted between 0 and 2 days of induction. At day 3, colonies started to spread, firmly attached to the surface of the culture dishes, revealing cells with morphological characteristics distinct from those seen in untreated ES cell cultures (Figs. 1B, 1C).
2 ]# p/ Q( e5 }: o  i- B! Z; }# K; \. h
Figure 1. Forced expression of Cdx2 in ES cells induces their differentiation. (A): The bicistronic DNA construct used to generate stably transfected transgenic GR*Cdx2 ES cells. The construct directs ubiquitous expression of the fusion between GR* domain and full-length Cdx2 protein from the cytomegalovirus IE enhancer/chicken ß-actin promoter, CX (19). (B): Time-lapse recording of GR*Cdx2 ES cells during the course of DEX-induced differentiation (right panel); the left panel shows the same ES cells induced with the vehicle (control). (C): Magnified image of the DEX-induced colony at day 6 from (B); arrowhead points to a typical TG cell, and arrow shows under-differentiated cluster of ES cells or trophoblast stem cells. Abbreviations: DEX, dexamethasone; ES, embryonic stem; GR*, glucorticoid receptor; TG, trophoblast giant.
4 G, r2 ]9 o) I0 U; K+ I
: E- C. V0 S+ W8 W4 u  e/ @Figure 2. TG characteristics of differentiated GR*Cdx2 ES cells. (A): Flow cytometry analysis of PI-stained GR*Cdx2 ES cells before (0d) and after 6 days of exposure to DEX (y-axis, cell count; x-axis, PI intensity); 2N (diploid), 4N (tetraploid), and 8N (octaploid) DNA contents; right panels show fluorescent microscopy image of PI-stained cells just before the cytometry analysis. (B): Time-lapse analysis of placental steroid in culture media at various time points (0¨C12 days) of DEX-induced differentiation. (C): In situ hybridization with the TG marker Pl-1 antisense RNA of two GR*Cdx2 ES cell colonies cultured in the presence of DEX for 8 days. Abbreviations: DEX, dexamethasone; ES, embryonic stem; PI, propidium iodide; TG, trophoblast giant.7 \# n) ^& n  G  ~) k- c2 O$ q
' s1 J( N0 `8 s# V7 X' X
Figure 3. Lineage marker expression analysis during the course of DEX-induced differentiation of GR*Cdx2 ES cells. Reverse transcription¨Cpolymerase chain reaction analysis of short-term (A) and long-term cultures (B). (C): Double immunolabeling with Cdx2 (green) and Oct4 antibodies (red) of vehicle-treated control (upper row) and 5d-DEX-induced (lower row) cells. Notice that the GR*Cdx2 fusion protein remains cytoplasmic in the cluster of Oct4-positive cells (arrow). Abbreviations: DEX, dexamethasone; GR*, glucorticoid receptor.7 m0 ?4 i" k! C. m' a# P, p/ s
9 B$ Z  |; Y$ H
Differentiated GR*Cdx2 ES cell colonies seemed to comprise cells of various morphological characteristics. Most remarkably, large flattened cells with polyploid nuclei, a hallmark of TG cells, appeared in these cultures. Such cells were never observed in vehicle (EtOH)¨Ctreated GR*Cdx2 cells (Fig. 1B, left) or in DEX-induced wild-type ES cell cultures (data not shown). Clusters of small compact cells, sometimes persisting even after prolonged (>10 days) exposure to DEX, are likely to represent nondifferentiated ES cells because of the retention of Oct4 expression (Fig. 3C). Their resistance to differentiation can be explained by the failure of DEX to induce nuclear translocation of GR*Cdx2 fusion (Fig. 3C). The reason for this selective resistance was unknown; however, the subpopulation of such ES cells was always relatively minor., g1 C4 ~8 e9 k* ?
& t! z4 `" ~& }0 \# K
The DEX-induced GR*Cdx2 ES cell cultures produced cells with increased ploidy (Fig. 2A) and secreted high levels of two mouse placenta steroids, androstenedione and progesterone (Fig. 2B). By day 8 of induction, approximately 80% of colonies showed the onset of RNA expression of the TG marker placental lactogen-1 (Pl1) in one or more cells (Fig. 2C). The percentage of Pl1-positive cells per total number of cells in a colony (on average, 30%) and levels of Pl1 RNA therein varied (Fig. 2C), possibly reflecting asynchronous differentiation of GR*Cdx2 ES cells upon DEX treatment. Taken together, these results support the notion that forced expression of Cdx2 protein in ES cells promotes their differentiation into cells with TG characteristics, thus referred to hereafter as TG-like (TGL) cells.
; f0 H. X& b. t5 ^+ \
( Z" {" o; N0 X$ QActivation of the leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway promotes ES cell self-renewal by suppressing endoderm-like differentiation . However, the withdrawal of LIF during DEX-induced differentiation of GR*Cdx2 ES cells still resulted in TGL colonies with no sign of enhanced endodermal differentiation (data not shown), suggesting that Cdx2 can override the ES cell self-renewal transcription programs controlled by LIF.5 h/ {& }! B" Z% U( A* v3 H1 s
3 D9 F+ n% X7 G
We next surveyed the expression of known lineage markers during the time course of Cdx2-promoted ES cell differentiation. As expected from the ubiquitous activity of the CX promoter, GR*Cdx2 RNA was uniformly present throughout all samples (data not shown). No significant changes in expression levels of most examined marker mRNAs were detected in controls, either DEX-treated wild-type ES cells or vehicle-treated GR*Cdx2 ES cells (Figs. 3A, 3B; Fig. 4D, lanes 7¨C9, and data not shown). In contrast, DEX-induced transgenic ES cells displayed remarkable changes in marker gene expression. The pluripotency-associated RNAs Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Fgf4, and Id1 were rapidly downregulated, as seen in short-term induced cultures (0¨C48 hours). Expression of these was maintained at low (Oct4) or undetectable (Utf1) levels, yet some genes (Fgf4, Sox2, Nanog) seemed to be slightly upregulated in long-term cultures. However, expression levels were consistently lower than those of noninduced control cells (Fig. 3B). The reason for this might reside in the resistance of a minority of GR*Cdx2 ES cells to DEX induction (Fig. 3C). Because these cells retain self-renewing capacity, in contrast to mitotically arrested TG cells, their contribution in the total mRNA pool may gradually increase in long-term induced cultures.
3 G9 f: c. v0 [
6 A- l1 o: N8 P* k! R; g% tFigure 4. Similar morphology of embryo-derived TS6.5 (A) and GR*Cdx2 TSLES cell colonies (B) in the presence Fgf4, heparin, and MEF-CM as per established protocol (18); some TG cells are occasionally seen (arrows). (C): TSLES cell line showed differentiated into TGLES cells upon the withdrawal of Fgf4 and MEF-CM. Comparison of lineage marker expression in TSLES and TS cells derived from 3.5-dpc blastocyst (TS3.5) and 6.5-dpc ExE (TS6.5), using an established protocol (18). Corresponding TG cells differentiated from the TS cells after Fgf4 and MEF-CM withdrawal. Parental GR*Cdx2 ES cells and wild-type ES cells cultured with (ESwt DEX) or without (ESwt) DEX stimulation are included as controls. Abbreviations: DEX, dexamethasone; ES, embryonic stem; ExE, extraembryonic ectoderm; GR*, glucorticoid receptor; MEF-CM, mouse embryonic fibroblast¨Cconditioned media; TG, trophoblast giant; TGLES, ES-derived trophoblast giant¨Clike; TS, trophoblast stem; TSLES, ES-derived trophoblast stem¨Clike.9 i6 K: p4 f, C0 Q

/ T7 K. N+ j$ }3 DContrary to the pluripotent genes, the pantrophoblast Hand1 and diploid trophoblast-specific markers Cdx2 (endogenous), Eomes, Fgfr2, and Bmp4 were upregulated, which was already apparent after 48 hours of DEX treatment (Fig. 3A). The induction of endogenous Cdx2 RNA could be due, at least in part, to the positive auto-regulatory loop previously described for this gene . Notably, the expression levels of the diploid trophoblast markers started to decline at day 4¨C6 of induction, accompanied by an increase of expression of the TG-specific markers Pl1 and Tpbp (4311) (Fig. 3B and data not shown). This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that the DEX-induced transgenic ES cells progress through a diploid trophoblast state that is initially established but cannot be maintained.
# y  \: {- r( V1 ^! u) J7 E; J. A6 P$ d
Fgf4 and previously unknown substances secreted by mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells, more recently identified as transforming growth factor¨Cß (TGF-ß)/activin . Therefore, we hypothesized that the transient, presumably TS-like, state of the differentiating GR*Cdx2 cells could be maintained upon supply of the same factors. Therefore, the GR*Cdx2 ES cells were DEX-induced in the presence of Fgf4, heparin, and MEF-conditioned media (MEF-CM), resulting in nearly all colonies acquiring TS-like phenotype after 7 days, with TGL cells also frequently seen. These colonies were individually picked and expanded for 10 days in the presence of DEX. DEX was omitted afterward, and the cells were cultured for at least seven passages (4¨C7 days each) under TS-permissive culture conditions before being photographed (Fig. 4B). We reasoned that DEX inclusion during the derivation would help to keep the minor population of undifferentiated GR*Cdx2 ES cells (Fig. 3C) under continuous differentiation-promoting pressure. We also reasoned that without such a pressure, this subpopulation of cells would outgrow relatively slow-proliferating TS-like derivatives during further passaging. Of note, the TS media can support GR*Cdx2 or wild-type ES cell self-renewal without overt endodermal differentiation, owing to the LIF present in the MEF-CM. The derived, ES cell¨Cfree cell lines (Fig. 4B) are referred to hereafter as ES-derived TS-like, or TSLES, cells due to their unambiguous resemblance to the embryo-derived TS cells (Fig. 4A). As could be anticipated from their TS nature, the withdrawal of Fgf4 and/or MEF-CM resulted in differentiation of TSLES cells into ES-derived TG-like (TGLES) cells (Fig. 4C).- F. ^; X, d4 F2 U: U

9 Y$ a/ m" C3 q! _7 RWe next examined the expression profiles of characteristic marker mRNAs in wild-type and GR*Cdx2 ES cells, TSL/TGLES cells, and the embryo-derived TS/TG counterparts (Fig. 4D). GR*Cdx2 ES cells grown in the presence of vehicle (lane 7), wild-type ES cells induced or noninduced with DEX showed nearly identical expression levels of the pluripotency-associated RNAs, Fgf4, Oct4, Nanog, Sox2, and Id1, as well as low or undetectable levels of trophoblast-specific Cdx2 (endogenous), Fgfr2b/c, Eomes, Hand1, and Pl1 RNAs (lanes 7¨C9). TSLES cells exhibited an expression pattern that was most similar to that of TS3.5 cells, in respect to expression of the diploid trophoblast markers Cdx2 (endogenous), Fgfr2b, and Eomes, and pantrophoblast Hand1, as well as to the absence of the pluripotency-associated markers (lanes 1¨C3). The TG-specific PlI RNA seems to be expressed at a higher level in TSLES cells (lane 3) than in the embryo-derived counterparts, suggesting a higher incidence of spontaneous TG differentiation in the former cells. TS6.5 cells show weak but detectable expression of Oct4 RNA (lanes 2 and 5), which might reflect a contamination with epiblast-derived or unrelated Oct4-expressing cells. Lastly, TGLES, like TG3.5 and TG6.5 cells, showed downregulation of TS-specific markers (Cdx2, Fgfr2b), though upregulation of TG-specific PlI was not obvious. We concluded that the ES cell¨Cderived and embryo-derived TS/TG cells share many gene expression characteristics.; ]! a1 X" U+ M; I9 S) _7 n9 i( V
( Y9 J; B) x1 \; Q- \! I
DISCUSSION0 M% L2 u* F0 L. O. [: l3 {

/ b9 q7 U) v; v- }. {6 B% NIn this report, we show that forced Cdx2 expression can trigger trophoblast differentiation of mouse ES cells. Whether Cdx2 might play the same instructive role in trophoblast specification during preimplantation development and the possible molecular mechanism of Cdx2 functioning are two points discussed below.4 e& W" S: n% O  ]5 z' x( S) r
! Y. ^& l8 R  X9 v* C# Z; F# u
The pluripotency-associated RNAs Oct4, Nanog, Fgf4, and Sox2 are rapidly downregulated in ES cells after Cdx2 induction (Fig. 3). At least two of them, Oct4 and Nanog, are ectopically expressed in the TE of 4.5-dpc Cdx2 null blastocysts (.
) j$ T, A5 A7 N
$ l1 {  ?8 F/ b3 `7 A9 b1 F9 N# ?An apparent possibility is that Cdx2-mediated Oct4 repression in our ES cell model triggers trophoblast differentiation. Therefore, one can anticipate that maintained Oct4 expression in DEX-induced GR*Cdx2 ES cells should neutralize the effect of Cdx2 and thereby rescue ES cell phenotype. Our preliminary tests suggest that this is indeed the case. We were able to derive DEX-resistant GR*Cdx2 ES cells by introducing into them a constitutively expressed Oct4 transgene. Subsequent removal of this transgene restored DEX responsiveness, providing compelling evidence that Cdx2-mediated repression of Oct4 alone is sufficient for trophoblast differentiation of GR*Cdx2 ES cells. Moreover, we have observed that Cdx2 is a potent repressor of Oct4 gene in transient transfection assays and, besides, can be cross-linked to a regulatory region of Oct4 locus (unpublished data).
) a8 n* i5 S8 e* Z8 x, q  J; b: T& k4 z: P0 E
There is, however, an observation that argues against a crucial role of Cdx2 in mediating Oct4 repression in vivo. Oct4 mRNA and protein seem to be present rather uniformly in all cells of the morula, as well as in both ICM and nascent TE cells of the early blastocyst (3.5 dpc). Oct4 protein is visibly down-regulated in TE only by the expanded blastocyst stage (4.5 dpc), coincident with the complete segregation of the TE. Cdx2 protein is detectable in the outer cells of the morula from approximately the 16-cell stage onward and, later, in TE (.0 U% M9 P" I) z4 U) c

. I2 a; O- K! H; R. C$ R* T' N2 A% s, K2 UES cells represent powerful in vitro models for studying regulation of developmental processes. However, these models suffer from the somewhat artificial nature of ES cells and their ex vivo maintenance. Therefore, the conclusion that Cdx2-mediated Oct4 repression occurs and that this regulatory link is a prerequisite for proper trophoblast development cannot be transferred one-to-one to preimplantation development, but requires careful validation using in vivo models. Genetic experiments, such as double Cdx2/Oct4 null mutants, may help elucidate the molecular control of TE lineage segregation.
0 q3 u4 N0 @8 G8 r3 S
  w9 J- [/ _  l4 ?5 D) fACKNOWLEDGMENTS
7 u6 d  [" n& m/ H" U, D" k$ T; B: {4 j* w9 b
We are grateful to Felix Beck for Cdx2 anti-sera, Francis Stew-art for pBKC-CreGR* plasmids, and Masaru Okabe for pCX-EGFP plasmids, Andreas W¨¹rch for flow cytometry assistance, and Birgit Koschorz, Robert Turek, and Max Volkov for technical assistance, and Takashi Hiiragi, Benoît Kanzler, and Davor Solter for inspiring discussions. This work was initially supported by the Marion Dilley and David George Jones Funds and the Commonwealth and General Assembly of Pennsylvania (H.R.S.) and, subsequently, by the Max Planck Society (H.R.S. and A.T.).! x1 i9 j3 m# ]

7 w, H0 ?7 B( J1 p' N$ y8 sDISCLOSURES
; c+ @2 j9 A$ R" }( a9 a
- C; j$ _7 k( H$ ^The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.; Z3 H8 u1 i( A; N- w. J! ?& x+ x
          【参考文献】
* N1 w+ R  o* u# g
; y( }3 C+ @/ w: _; u
* ~/ O; Q* R* O# YRossant J, Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y. Lineage allocation and asymmetries in the early mouse embryo. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003;358:1341¨C1348.$ R, M; d  o4 ]( j- D+ b# \7 R$ [

0 @* V( e) M" ^7 a5 `Hogan B, Tilly R. In vitro development of inner cell masses isolated immunosurgically from mouse blastocysts. II. Inner cell masses from 35-to 40-day pc blastocysts J Embryol Exp Morphol 1978;45:107¨C121.+ J( F6 ^0 P8 K1 @! l+ N9 o
- o) L; e& C; g8 `# \
Rossant J, Vijn KM. Ability of outside cells from preimplantation mouse embryos to form inner cell mass derivatives. Dev Biol 1980;76:475¨C482.8 s& q. q4 L6 }4 y  ?5 z# o& s" Z

4 f7 k' G7 R: D& ~  aKunath T, Strumpf D, Rossant J. Early trophoblast determination and stem cell maintenance in the mouse. Placenta 2004;25(suppl A):S32¨CS38.% U$ p* i( z, S3 M: @  H0 [0 T
( `2 K5 ?( m2 Z' j; J) ?
Beck F, Erler T, Russell A et al. Expression of Cdx-2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: possible role in patterning of the extra-embryonic membranes. Dev Dyn 1995;204:219¨C227.+ Q# j: [3 Q9 U' p

8 B1 T1 `3 e6 DStrumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y et al. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2005;132:2093¨C2102.
% X% v( s7 q( s4 ?! c9 R$ R/ G* F* a& x  L- w: s
Uy GD, Downs KM, Gardner RL. Inhibition of trophoblast stem cell potential in chorionic ectoderm coincides with occlusion of the ectoplacental cavity in the mouse. Development 2002;129:3913¨C3924.
6 U. Q  }, T" G' t$ a& E+ Q: l5 d$ T
Chawengsaksophak K, James R, Hammond VE et al. Homeosis and intestinal tumours in Cdx2 mutant mice. Nature 1997;386:84¨C87.( ~5 P9 v" B4 B5 P* E

% M; R  `1 p: G/ c, J7 KSmith AG. Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2001;17:435¨C462.
/ E9 m# Y1 i) H$ p7 e( S
- y% i+ {) f" H0 o  @Rossant J, Spence A. Chimeras and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis. Trends Genet 1998;14:358¨C363.
' X: f& }: K( |- ~
5 @5 H4 Y# v* _/ v* T4 P4 NNiwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 2000;24:372¨C376.
! z, Z0 ?9 F! A: [7 z8 m# G! V: S2 r1 L  s( g3 Q2 ?* |3 `2 I3 h
Fujikura J, Yamato E, Yonemura S et al. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells is induced by GATA factors. Genes Dev 2002;16:784¨C789.: h% }3 l" }; t6 `  i# J
' q* V3 x  s* P( w
Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2003;113:643¨C655.+ ^6 N$ T8 `1 d# K5 Z* |. v
: w3 Z% r# m( x; ^: t2 D' @
Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 2003;113:631¨C642." V# F$ q; N9 |: o
5 j; D8 u  Q& M" _2 A: |; F
Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998;95:379¨C391.5 m7 [# ^, P6 d0 ^

4 p  k, L& q! L8 b4 ]Xu F, Li H, Jin T. Cell type-specific autoregulation of the Caudal-related homeobox gene Cdx-2/3. J Biol Chem 1999;274:34310¨C34316.0 }( W+ O5 D6 X. n3 c% ]
/ `) d7 G+ ], H1 C  ^$ W9 }
Erlebacher A, Price KA, Glimcher LH. Maintenance of mouse trophoblast stem cell proliferation by TGF-beta/activin. Dev Biol 2004;275: 158¨C169.+ T7 f& D- s) X1 _$ |5 V8 \
, w- e' q2 N8 ^" Z2 p2 K
Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakis AK et al. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 1998;282:2072¨C2075.
$ ~- \* g: T. o; ^" U/ |7 J0 }
Kato M, Yamanouchi K, Ikawa M et al. Efficient selection of transgenic mouse embryos using EGFP as a marker gene. Mol Reprod Dev 1999;54: 43¨C48.

Rank: 2

积分
64 
威望
64  
包包
1769  
沙发
发表于 2015-6-29 21:01 |只看该作者
设置阅读啊  

Rank: 2

积分
80 
威望
80  
包包
1719  
藤椅
发表于 2015-7-22 17:27 |只看该作者
哦...............  

Rank: 2

积分
72 
威望
72  
包包
1942  
板凳
发表于 2015-8-9 17:10 |只看该作者
干细胞之家微信公众号
围观来了哦  

Rank: 2

积分
70 
威望
70  
包包
1809  
报纸
发表于 2015-8-22 21:00 |只看该作者
我仅代表干细胞之家论坛前来支持,感谢楼主!  

Rank: 2

积分
116 
威望
116  
包包
1832  
地板
发表于 2015-9-2 20:18 |只看该作者
拿分走人呵呵,楼下继续!

Rank: 2

积分
72 
威望
72  
包包
1730  
7
发表于 2015-9-15 23:10 |只看该作者
哎 怎么说那~~  

Rank: 2

积分
73 
威望
73  
包包
1833  
8
发表于 2015-9-28 21:43 |只看该作者
支持一下吧  

Rank: 2

积分
98 
威望
98  
包包
1756  
9
发表于 2015-10-7 13:12 |只看该作者
干细胞库  

Rank: 2

积分
70 
威望
70  
包包
1809  
10
发表于 2015-10-12 18:33 |只看该作者
呵呵,找个机会...  
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册
验证问答 换一个

Archiver|干细胞之家 ( 吉ICP备2021004615号-3 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-30 04:54

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.