|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-9 10:21 编辑
# E- J2 r' c, Q* D8 ?) \1 c
" _! |6 @8 L& T/ A6 ^0 N* TThe apparent use of sarin to kill more than 1,400 civilians in3 m) q+ i# u6 T( Z: I7 U
Damascus on 21 August may highlight the limits of the Chemical
& ]2 l# |, L8 D tWeapons Convention (CWC) — but that does not mean that7 Q7 h. p) g9 F; U7 U, w
the world can afford to turn its back on such treaties.6 g. @; a! c; K# D0 n9 p
The role of international treaties in restricting the proliferation of6 J- Z q. H4 }4 ]! ^1 O A
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons has not had a good press in0 |# L# r& y7 \9 V2 O1 d
recent years. Conventional wisdom tends to scorn the value of such9 B- q+ ?4 M! |$ \7 V
‘pieces of paper’ in real politick. Critics from both the left and the right
2 x2 L9 d& j6 j; A' jheap derision on their selective reach and implementation.5 _) h: d$ u, _& L& d, u, z; E+ }
Yet these treaties are crucial to everyone who is interested in making
: I7 D0 Q% r- S; r5 Uwars less barbaric and less frequent. Pieces of paper they may be, but. v* k& I* Z' I2 c+ V
large powers adhere to their contents with care, as do the smaller ones8 ], E2 e: ^' W
who crave international respectability.
4 j1 x$ l8 V; ^3 t4 U7 F3 \: F1 {3 ^# `* I: ^
# B2 k# X/ v7 X! s+ Q5 t- G[hide][/hide] |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-5 17:01
发表于 2013-9-5 21:10
