|
- 积分
- 0
- 威望
- 0
- 包包
- 0
|
Departments of Internal Medicine, Physiology, and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City5 V9 _- k/ s7 n) H7 A
0 J1 k& L% G; ^7 {, N2 W* c" J! i
Nephrology Research, and Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah
) h) W( A# E( g' ]* l) r
* L6 A* c' \% d; t- S# ]ABSTRACT
: d% y% r+ T; z2 `( k& D2 ?
) T; n: y2 ~8 E D$ ?Circulating vasopressin levels change in hydrated and dehydrated conditions and thus control osmotic water permeability (Pf) of the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD). Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) antagonizes vasopressin-induced Pf of IMCD. Previously, we showed that activation of P2Y2 receptor (P2Y2-R) in IMCD results in production and release of PGE2, and P2Y2-R mRNA and protein are significantly elevated in inner medullas of hydrated rats compared with dehydrated rats. Therefore, we examined whether the altered expression of P2Y2-R in hydrated and dehydrated states is associated with corresponding changes in P2Y2-R-mediated PGE2 release by the IMCD. Rats were hydrated by providing sucrose water as the sole drinking fluid or dehydrated by water deprivation for 2 days. This resulted in high output-low osmolality and low output-high osmolality urines in hydrated and dehydrated rats, respectively. In hydrated rats, there was a significant increase in tubular fluid PGE2, measured indirectly by assessing the urinary PGE2 metabolite. Stimulation of freshly isolated IMCD preparations in vitro with P2Y2-R agonist (ATPS) showed a marked increase in the release of PGE2 in hydrated rats compared with normal rats. These responses were blunted in the IMCD prepared from dehydrated rats. The P2Y2-R-mediated PGE2 release in the IMCD of hydrated rats was mediated largely by cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 as COX-1-specific inhibitor valeroyl salicylate completely blocked the release. The COX-2-specific inhibitor N5398 had only a modest and insignificant inhibitory effect. In conclusion, the increased sensitivity of purinergic-prostanoid interaction seen in the IMCD of hydrated rats may represent a novel vasopressin-independent regulatory mechanism of IMCD function.. x5 x; B2 T; e: S3 ?; U# ]
$ m P- |; x, P0 e: j, u4 v. Jcyclooxygenases; extracellular nucleotides; arginine vasopressin; purinergic; aquaporin; inner medullary collecting duct; prostaglandin E22 C9 Y |1 v2 Q" n# O4 e
/ C7 p- ~3 K; j5 f
THE REABSORPTION OF WATER by the kidney is crucial for the conservation of body water and excretion of concentrated urine. Within the kidney, the collecting duct system is the site of regulated water reabsorption. It is under the control of the neurohypophyseal hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP). AVP, acting through its V2 receptor, a G protein-coupled receptor on the collecting duct principal cells, activates membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase to produce cAMP as a second messenger. Increased cellular cAMP levels mediate the short- and long-term effects of AVP on the collecting duct water transport. The short-term response involves translocation of aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channels from a pool of subapical vesicles to apical plasma membrane, which is the rate-limiting barrier in the transcellular movement of water (26). The long-term effect involves transcriptional activation of AQP2 gene by cAMP through CRE and AP1 sites in AQP2 promoter (13, 23, 41). This results in increased accumulation of AQP2 protein in the collecting duct (7, 16, 34).- j" k. M% x' A4 U5 j! |
2 X3 k% E0 y( L; |( [; a" tIn rats subjected to water loading or hydration, urine osmolality and circulating levels of AVP are very low, similar to the condition of compulsive water drinking seen in humans. These are associated with decreased protein abundance and/or altered subcellular localization of AVP-regulated water channel AQP2 in the inner medulla (34). Conversely, water deprivation or dehydration results in elevated urine osmolality and circulating AVP levels. These are associated with increased protein abundance and apical membrane targeting of AQP2 in the inner medulla (27, 34).
3 n% v! J" W* k4 n. V
6 [8 L0 \* T$ j7 K, B; p) yApart from AVP, a variety of autocrine and paractine agents, such as PGE2, endothelin, and extracellular nucleotides (ATP/UTP), are known to regulate the collecting duct water permeability. Acting via their respective receptors, and the associated phosphoinositide signaling pathway, these agents decrease the AVP-stimulated osmotic water permeability of the collecting duct (16, 20, 25, 28, 29). Despite this knowledge, the roles of locally released mediators in the regulation of medullary collecting duct water transport under physiological conditions of hydration and water deprivation have not been explored.! F. V6 |1 l. {5 ]% u
8 P, k, I/ E$ C: i+ d) K& k
All renal cells are known to release nucleotides into the extracellular milieu in a regulated fashion (30, 31). Pharmacological, physiological, electrophysiological, and molecular studies have unraveled the autocrine and/or paracrine signaling elicited by extracellular nucleotides through P2 purinergic receptors. P2 receptors have been shown to regulate glomerular, microvascular, and epithelial functions of the kidney (14, 22, 31, 32, 35). P2Y2 receptor is a G protein-coupled extracellular nucleotide receptor. It has been identified and localized in the rat inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) (9, 17). We demonstrated that the agonist activation of P2Y2 receptor downregulates AVP-stimulated osmotic water permeability in isolated, microperfused rat IMCD by decreasing cellular cAMP levels in a protein kinase C-dependent manner (16). Recently, we showed that P2Y2 receptor stimulation triggers the production and release of PGE2 by rat IMCD preparations in a cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) activity-dependent manner (36). Thus our studies indicate that in rat IMCD, signaling through P2Y2 receptor drives the production of PGE2. This has important physiological significance, because PGE2 is known to affect the transport of water, salt, and urea in IMCD (25, 28, 29).
4 M) |; l( L" M; L- u
: {( A% z$ A& a$ A) z1 N3 ]7 b4 ~5 c1 fMore recently, we observed that the expression of P2Y2 receptor mRNA and protein in the inner medulla is altered by the hydration status of the animals. Thus, in hydrated rats the expression of P2Y2 receptor mRNA and protein in the inner medulla is significantly higher compared with the dehydrated rats (18). This prompted us to hypothesize that the altered expression of P2Y2 receptor in hydrated and dehydrated conditions may be associated with changes in P2Y2 receptor-driven PGE2 production by the IMCD. In this study, we examined that possibility.
7 X9 U! \5 |* r) o: \
3 s) M) h/ q9 b! V3 X2 K2 SMATERIALS AND METHODS
( U& {5 }5 R& r+ b& q
/ `5 ]. W6 O0 p" U$ sExperimental animals. The animal experiments were carried out according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Utah and VA Salt Lake City Health Care System. Specific pathogen-free male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were housed two or three per cage in the Veterinary Medical Unit of the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System. This is an American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)-accredited and US Department of Agriculture (USDA)- and Public Health Service (PHS)-approved animal facility. The rats were maintained in pathogen-free state and fed ad libitum a commercial rodent diet. They had free access to drinking water unless restricted by the experimental protocol. The rats were acclimated to the housing conditions for about a week before experiments were conducted. The rats weighed 294 ± 8 g (means ± SE) at the time of euthanasia.# i8 m. P7 }+ N3 C0 E
. ?' Z' M: Z3 ]1 X& q
Hydration and dehydration of rats. Hydration and dehydration of rats were achieved according to the protocol described earlier (18). Briefly, hydrated rats received 600 mM sucrose (commercially available dietary cane sugar) in tap water for 2 days (48 h) as the sole drinking fluid. The sweetness of the sucrose solution caused the rats to drink large amounts of fluid and thus established a hydrated state associated with diuresis. The dehydrated rats were deprived of water for 2 days (48 h). In addition to the hydrated and dehydrated rats, a group of normal rats was included, which received only tap water ad libitum. All rats had free access to pelleted chow.
# O. k; {7 m5 B. l6 r# Q. [% x
0 }' v/ Y: t7 P- ]5 xCollection and analysis of urine samples. Urine samples were collected from rats by placing them in individual plastic metabolic cages during the last 24 h of the experimental period, just before euthanasia. After collection, volumes of 24-h urine samples were noted. Aliquots of urine samples were centrifuged to remove suspended particles. The supernatants were used to measure osmolality by vapor pressure method (Wescor model 5100C, Wescor, Logan, UT). In some groups of hydrated, dehydrated, and normal rats, PGE2 metabolite in urine was assayed using Prostaglandin E Metabolite EIA Kit (Catalog no. 514531; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). PGE2 in blood, urine, and other body fluids is not stable. It is rapidly converted into its 13,14-dihydro-15-keto metabolite. The Prostaglandin E Metabolite assay kit converts all of the immediate PGE2 metabolites in the urine samples to a single, stable derivative that could be easily quantified by EIA. According to the manufacturer, this assay system has 100% specificity toward bicyclo prostaglandin E1; 13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGE1 and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGE2. Specificity toward other prostanoids or leukotrienes or thromboxanes is ) w$ V" X' Q* z
?' @" A8 A( D3 O- I; ^1 M% IPreparation of fractions enriched in IMCD. Fractions enriched in IMCD were prepared from rat kidney inner medullas as described previously (19, 36). Briefly, rats were euthanized by pentobarbital sodium overdose. Both kidneys were removed rapidly and chilled on ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. The inner medullas or papillas were dissected. The dissected papillas were transferred to an isotonic HEPES-buffered physiological solution of the following composition (in mM): 135 NaCl, 0.5 KCl, 0.1 Na2HPO4, 0.3 sodium acetate, 0.12 Na2SO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 5 HEPES, and 5.5 D-glucose (pH 7.4, 300–310 mosmol/kgH2O). This solution was oxygenated by bubbling in 95% O2-5% CO2. Because earlier studies showed that PGE2 synthesis in IMCD is sensitive to increasing osmolality of the medium (15), we carried out all our experiments in 300 mosmol/kgH2O medium to exclude variability due to osmolality. Depending on the nature of the experiment, renal papillas from three or four rats were pooled to obtain a sufficient amount of IMCD preparations for incubations. The pooled papillas were minced with a razor blade. The minced tissue was then digested at 37°C with collagenase B (3 mg/ml) and hyaluronidase (600 U/ml) in the same HEPES-buffered physiological solution for 40–50 min with continuous oxygenation. Midway through the digestion process, DNase I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to the digestion mixture to digest stray DNA released from broken cells. The digestion mixture was intermittently aspirated into and pushed through a glass Pasteur pipette with a long, narrow tip to disperse the tubules into a uniform suspension. After digestion of the tubules into a uniform suspension, the IMCD fraction was separated from the non-IMCD elements (thin limbs and vasculature) by sedimentation by low-speed centrifugation and repeated washings. The final pellet was suspended in the oxygenated HEPES-buffered physiological solution to a protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. The final suspension was kept on ice for 30 min to allow for recovery of IMCD cells from stress. This preparation consisted of mostly IMCD segments or sheets of IMCD cells and a very few other non-IMCD elements. Characterization of IMCD preparations obtained by this procedure for enrichment in IMCD and for cell viability has been documented earlier (19, 36).
, K7 t+ U6 y3 u2 y
" r( x3 V6 ?. ]9 W% `! Z, MIncubation of IMCD preparations. Fractions enriched in IMCD were incubated with or without the addition of inhibitors of COX and/or ATPS. At the end of the incubation, the amount of PGE2 released from the cells was assayed as described previously (36). Briefly, after keeping the IMCD preparations on ice for 30 min for recovery from stress, they were aliquoted into 1.5-ml plastic microtubes kept on ice. ATPS stock solution (x10 final incubation concentration) was prepared in the same oxygenated HEPES-buffered physiological solution used for the preparation of IMCD suspensions. Stock solutions of valeroyl salicylate and NS-398 were prepared by dissolving in DMSO at a very high concentration, aliquoted, and frozen at –20°C. These stock solutions were diluted freshly before use with the HEPES-buffered physiological solution to give a x10 final incubation concentration. The aliquots of IMCD suspensions were warmed to 37°C for 5 min on heat blocks before the agents were added. When ATPS alone was used without any COX inhibitors, the incubations were started immediately after the 5-min warm-up period and lasted for 10 or 20 min depending on the nature of the experiment. When the COX inhibitors were used, the IMCD were initially warmed-up for 5 min. Then, they were preincubated with the inhibitors for 5 or 15 min depending on the type of the inhibitor used. This was followed by incubation for another 20 min after the addition of ATPS. To control incubations that did not contain any inhibitor and/or ATPS, equal volumes of vehicle (incubation buffer) were added, so that all the incubations had a final volume of 200 μl. Incubations were carried out either in triplicate or quadruplicate. To stop the reactions, chilled HEPES-buffered physiological solution (200 μl) was added and the tubes were kept on ice for a few minutes. The tubes were then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min in a cold room (4°C). And 350 μl of the supernatant from each tube were transferred to a fresh tube and stored at –80°C until assayed for the PGE2 content. The pellets with the remaining 50 μl of incubation buffer were frozen at –20°C for protein assay.
+ @' `5 n/ R+ e- X- P3 ^6 q, [0 z
4 x& W% ^& F3 }( Y7 {Assay of PGE2. PGE2 content in the supernatants from the incubations was determined according to the instructions of the manufacturer using the Prostaglandin E2 EIA Kit Monoclonal (Catalog no. 514010; Cayman Chemical). The absorbance of the product was read spectrophotometrically at 405 nm in a Spectra Max 250 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). According to the manufacturer, this assay system has a specificity of 100% to PGE2 and PGE2 ethanolamide, 37.4% specificity to 8-iso PGE2, and 43 and 18.7% to PGE3 and PGE1. For the assays, frozen supernatants were thawed on ice and diluted with EIA buffer to yield final dilutions in the range of 1:200 to 1:2,000 with respect to the original incubation. The assays were run on 50 μl of these diluted samples. The raw data from the plate reader were stored in a computer and analyzed using Soft MaxPro software (Molecular Devices). The protein content in each sample was measured to normalize for cell population present in each sample. Protein pellets prepared from the IMCD cell suspension samples were thawed at room temperature. Cellular proteins were precipitated and delipidated by addition of methanol. After separation of methanol by centrifugation and drying, the protein pellets were dissolved in 0.05 N NaOH. Aliquots of the clear solutions thus obtained were assayed for the protein content by Coomassie Plus Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce Endogen, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer＊s instructions. The concentrations of PGE2 in the incubations were normalized with the corresponding protein content and expressed as nanograms of PGE2 released per milligram of protein. The day-to-day coefficient of variation of this assay in our hands was 3–13% in the linear range of the standard curve (10–90% binding of tracer).9 b0 Y; O; H( L* I
& b! n; r; Y; j6 t: ~7 S
Agents. ATPS (96% purity) was purchased from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA). 2-[(1-Oxopentyl)oxy]-benzoic acid (valeroyl salicylate; 99% purity) and N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl] methansulfonamide (NS-398; 99% purity) were purchased from the Cayman Chemical. DMSO (99.9% purity) and DNAse I were from Sigma. Collagenase B was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN), and bovine testes hyaluronidase was from Worthington Biochemical (Lakewood, NJ). All other chemicals used were of the highest purity available.
4 Z" _& h5 o1 w9 k" d; }
. E: B } e0 _& YStatistical analysis. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Data were analyzed by one-way as well as by repeated-measures ANOVA followed by assessment of differences between the mean of the groups by Tukey-Kramer＊s or Bonferroni＊s multiple comparison tests. Unpaired t-test was used to directly compare two groups. P
7 |. \- f0 P. `7 k! \1 A
% _/ g& X; r& \) S# b: i7 v" RRESULTS+ {. {2 r& A( j- y+ r1 v G% V
# d3 I9 d6 d* \4 J m( KUrine parameters in normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats. The urine outputs (Fig. 1A) and urine osmolalities (Fig. 1B) are shown for normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats collected during the final 24 h of the experimental period. As shown in the Fig. 1, the dehydrated rats had low output of concentrated urine, whereas the hydrated rats had high output of dilute urine compared with the normal rats. Thus there are dramatic differences between dehydrated and hydrated groups with respect to urine volume and osmolality.
/ f6 N, i! T8 d# o0 ]7 _* i2 `
. R' E. ?" i$ ?+ z; O( F( p2 }Urinary PGE2 metabolite in normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats. Urine samples collected from normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats during the last 24 h of the experimental period were assayed for PGE2 metabolite content after appropriate dilution, using a commercial EIA kit. The urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite over 24 h in normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats is shown in Fig. 2. In contrast to normal rats, the mean urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite in dehydrated rats was only 12%, whereas it was increased to 142% in hydrated rats. Thus the hydrated group showed 12-fold higher urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite than the dehydrated group.5 C5 w) l$ Y# X9 Y
( f5 M3 J; j9 D8 r( wP2Y2 receptor-stimulated release of PGE2 by the IMCD preparations from normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats. Fractions enriched in IMCD were prepared from inner medullas of normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats and challenged with ATPS, a nonhydrolyzable agonist of P2Y2 receptor. Figure 3 shows the amount of PGE2 released following agonist stimulation vs. unstimulated IMCD (vehicle control) in different groups of rats. Agonist stimulation of P2Y2 receptor in IMCD of normal rats caused a modest but significant 50% increase in PGE2 released when directly compared with the corresponding vehicle-treated group by unpaired t-test. In the hydrated group, P2Y2 receptor stimulation caused 136% increase in PGE2 release over the unstimulated values. In contrast, the dehydrated group did not show any change. Thus, when stimulated by ATPS, IMCD from hydrated rats released >5- and 2.4-fold higher amounts of PGE2 compared with the dehydrated and normal groups, respectively. Basal amounts of PGE2 released during the experimental period by the unstimulated IMCD were numerically higher in hydrated and lower in dehydrated groups compared with the normal group, although these differences were not statistically significant when analyzed by ANOVA.8 c3 L/ `% q$ M# l" \) @1 d
% t- }( ?" p( n& [Time course of ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats. The large differences in urine volume, osmolality, and urinary PGE2 metabolite observed in dehydrated and hydrated groups represented the cumulative changes that occurred over a 48-h period. Therefore, to assess the potential kinetic differences in the response between dehydrated and hydrated rats, we directly compared the time course of ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD prepared from these two groups. Figure 4 shows the time course of PGE2 release by IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats after stimulation with 50 μM ATPS or no stimulation (vehicle). As shown in the figure, stimulated or unstimulated IMCD from dehydrated rats showed virtually no increase in the PGE2 release over time. On the other hand, unstimulated IMCD from hydrated rats showed a gradual increase over time, attaining statistical significance at 80 min. However, the stimulated IMCD from hydrated rats showed dramatic 3.3-, 5.2-, and 6.3-fold increases at 20, 40, and 80 min. Thus the IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats differed markedly in their ability to respond to P2Y2 receptor-stimulated PGE2 release over time. These results seen with the IMCD from hydrated rats for the time course of ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release were qualitatively similar to what we observed previously with IMCD from normal rats (36) but were quantitatively higher.4 _* t: g6 M' n& L' X( W, ]
. Z. w& a- n3 D; X) R
Effect of different concentrations of ATPS on PGE2 release by IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats. In parallel to the time course of ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD, we tested ATPS concentration response using IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats. Previously, we characterized the ATPS concentration response in IMCD of normal rats (36). Figure 5 shows ATPS concentration-response curve for the release of PGE2 by IMCD from dehydrated and hydrated rats following 10-min incubation. As shown in Fig. 5, in hydrated rats, there was an initial rapid increase even at 10 μM, followed by a more sustained increase up to 100 μM ATPS concentration. In contrast, IMCD from dehydrated rats did not show significant increase of PGE2 release at any ATPS concentration tested.+ [1 S$ m3 ~) M
& d0 {3 [* g1 V4 S& B% ]" E% a9 QEffect of COX-1 inhibition on ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from hydrated rats. Because IMCD of dehydrated rats showed virtually none or insignificant response to ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release, here we examined the IMCD from the hydrated rats only with respect to their sensitivity to COX-1 inhibition. Figure 6 shows the effect of valeroyl salicylate, a selective, irreversible inhibitor or COX-1 (3), on ATPS (50 μM)-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from hydrated rats. As shown in the figure, lower concentrations of valeroyl salicylate (30 μM) produced little inhibition of the ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release. However, 300 μM valeroyl salicylate completely inhibited the ATPS-stimulated release of PGE2 by the IMCD from hydrated rats. Although there were some differences in the level of PGE2 released during the experimental period between the vehicle controls and inhibitor alone incubations, these differences were not statistically significant. Thus P2Y2 receptor-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from hydrated rats, similar to the IMCD of normal rats (36), was dependent on the activity of COX-1., H, o1 T6 G- u( N5 y
4 \- w: X+ H1 O" ZEffect of COX-2 inhibition on ATPS-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from hydrated rats. Figure 7 shows the effect of NS-398, a selective competitive inhibitor of COX-2 (2), on ATPS (50 μM)-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD from hydrated rats. As shown in the figure, the stimulated release was not significantly inhibited by 10 and 30 μM of NS-398. These observations are similar to the one we made previously with IMCD from normal rats (36).
$ ?" _4 c( P" z! t3 S0 b5 b; `. c% M7 F; h6 w
DISCUSSION$ x* w' q7 o2 \2 H# X
) _. E( g7 P) Z
In this communication, we documented four major findings. First, we demonstrated that urinary excretion of PGE2, which reflects tubular fluid synthesis in vivo, is significantly higher in hydrated rats and lower in dehydrated rats compared with the normal rats. Second, we showed that ex vivo purinergic-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD is markedly elevated in hydrated rats compared with the normal or dehydrated rats. Third, we demonstrated that purinergic-stimulated increase in PGE2 release by IMCD of hydrated rats is time and agonist concentration dependent. Finally, we document that purinergic-stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD of hydrated rats is mediated by COX-1 but not COX-2. Because PGE2 is known to affect transport of water, salt, and urea by IMCD (25, 28, 29), the documented enhancement of purinergic-driven prostanoid production in IMCD of hydrated rats may constitute a potent AVP-independent regulatory mechanism.3 i& u2 C: I; y/ A+ V k( u
$ V. F: s% S+ B, m$ b- H4 b
In recent years, the potential roles of extracellular nucleotides in the regulation of renal tubular transport, especially that of salt and water, are increasingly recognized (31). P2Y2 receptor is an extracellular nucleotide with an agonist potency order of UTP ATP > ATPS > 2-MeS-ATP. Pharmacological and molecular approaches localized P2Y2 purinergic receptor in the IMCD of rat (9, 17). Our previous studies documented its physiological significance in opposing the AVP-mediated water reabsorption in isolated, microperfused rat IMCD (16). We also documented its ability to induce production and release of PGE2 by rat IMCD preparations (36).
% m! J$ S3 u5 Q. r! f
. M' X6 R) l: g1 p7 ^' y* S. dPGE2 is a major prostanoid in the kidney and it interacts with four known G protein-coupled E prostanoid receptors (EP1 to EP4). Through these prostanoid receptors, PGE2 modulates renal hemodynamics and salt and water excretion (5). The functional antagonism of PGE2 on AVP-stimulated water permeability in IMCD has been known for some time (11, 25). However, only recently the cell biological mechanisms of this antagonistic effect have been unraveled. Using ex vivo preparations of renal medulla, Zelenina et al. (42) demonstrated that agonist stimulation of EP3 prostanoid receptor in IMCD causes retrieval of AQP2 water channel from the apical membrane. This effectively reduces the abundance of AQP2 protein in the apical membrane, the rate-limiting barrier in the transepithelial water movement in the collecting duct.
6 r( A1 T, V! }3 g& R& P! D4 D+ O- c% W6 F8 `9 Y+ c3 ]
Recently, we observed that expression of P2Y2 receptor mRNA and protein is significantly higher in the inner medulla of hydrated rats compared with the dehydrated rats (18). This prompted us to examine whether the observed increase in P2Y2 receptor expression in hydrated rats is also associated with an increased purinergic-stimulated PGE2 release by the IMCD. To address this question, we used a model of freshly prepared IMCD fractions from collagenase- and hyaluronidase-digested rat inner medullas. This is a well-characterized model for the study of hormonal response of IMCD. In our previous communications, we validated the purity and viability of the IMCD preparation (17, 19, 36). Furthermore, based on the currently available experimental data, we can safely ascertain that P2Y2 receptor is perhaps the only P2 receptor whose expression in "native rat IMCD" is characterized by molecular, pharmacological, and functional approaches (9, 16, 17). Although the presence of other P2 receptors has been reported in cultured cell lines of renal collecting duct origin, such as mIMCD-3 cells (37), their presence in native rat IMCD has not been established. Furthermore, adenosine A1 receptor has been localized and characterized in the rat IMCD (10, 38). However, the use of ATPS, a nonhydrolyzable form of ATP, as a ligand in our experiments precluded the stimulation of functional adenosine receptors in our system.
2 l3 w% ^+ w; ^; l5 Y u8 r; h# w; i$ `* v$ D% |3 ~ Z+ S) k
Every renal structure produces PGE2. However, the medullary collecting duct accounts for 66% of the total PGE2 synthesized in the kidney. PGE2 produced in other renal structures is very low (3 to 6% of the total for each segment) (4). The release of synthesized prostaglandins from the cells, including collecting duct principal cells, is facilitated via specific prostaglandin transporters in the cell membranes (1). Prostaglandins that enter the tubular lumen are partially reabsorbed from the urine, and urinary prostaglandins probably reflect renal synthesis (8). In our study, the pattern of urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite in normal, dehydrated, and hydrated rats has parallels to the P2Y2 receptor-stimulated PGE2 release by the IMCD in these groups. It is very striking to note the large differences between dehydrated and hydrated rats with respect to the urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite as well as to the P2Y2 receptor-stimulated PGE2 release by the IMCD. These observations indicate that the urinary excretion of PGE2 metabolite represents the in vivo production and release of PGE2 by medullary collecting duct under the conditions of hydration and dehydration.
$ E, X* f5 G7 K/ W0 H9 g. b N
9 f+ v/ T5 x1 j6 E9 E) q4 TIn our earlier study, we documented that the ATPS-stimulated PGE2 by IMCD of normal rats was 4.3-fold over the unstimulated values after 60 min of incubation (36). In the current study, the stimulated PGE2 release by IMCD of hydrated rats was five- and sixfold over the unstimulated values after 40 and 80 min of incubation, respectively (Fig. 4). Similarly, the concentration-response curve for release of P2Y2 receptor-stimulated PGE2 by IMCD of normal rats attained a plateau over 25 μM ATPS concentration (36). However, the corresponding concentration-response curve for the IMCD of hydrated rats showed a tendency for continued increase between 50 to 100 μM ATPS despite a large variation at 100 μM ATPS concentration (Fig. 5). These data indicate that hydration of rats sensitizes the purinergic signaling system in the IMCD. Such sensitization results in increased production of PGE2 when the IMCD are exposed to concentrations of extracellular ATP that are comparable to the ones found in normal rats. Based on our current and previous data (36), we predict that the set point of activity of purinergic signaling is altered in the IMCD of hydrated rats compared with normal or dehydrated rats. This lowered threshold for purinergic signaling in hydrated rats results in enhanced production of PGE2 at extracellular concentrations of ATP that are comparable to the ones seen in normal rats.
; a1 _% r0 _( P2 W( } `+ ?/ L& p6 R1 w6 _& \
Almost every renal cell constitutively expresses COX-1. In contrast, COX-2 distribution in normal kidney is limited to only macula densa cells in the cortex and interstitial cells in the medulla. However, an increase in the medullary tonicity, such as that seen in dehydrated conditions, is known to induce COX-2, but not COX-1, expression in the medullary collecting duct cells of rat (40). Our observation on the COX-1 activity-dependent production of PGE2 in the IMCD of normal and hydrated polyuric rats is consistent with the expression of P2Y2 receptor and the constitutive expression of COX-1, but not COX-2, in IMCD cells under these conditions. Previous studies from our laboratories showed that concentrations of NS-398 used in the current experiments inhibited COX-2-mediated effects in cultured cortical neuronal cells (6). There is a possibility that our IMCD preparation may contain a few medullary interstitial cells, which express abundant amounts of COX-2 mRNA and protein (12). Yet, it is unlikely that these cells are stimulated by ATPS, because our immunohistochemical studies could not detect P2Y2 receptor protein in medullary interstitial cells (17; and Kishore, unpublished observations). Our results on the lack of COX-2 activity dependency in normal and hydrated rats are also consistent with this notion. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that the basal production of PGE2 in the IMCD of dehydrated rats is low. In addition, ATPS failed to stimulate any noticeable increase in PGE2 release, despite the fact that COX-2 expression is induced in IMCD cells by dehydration. This finding leads to two important conclusions. First, the COX-2 expression in the IMCD of dehydrated rats is not associated with production and/or release of significant amounts of PGE2. It may play a role in the survival of medullary cells under hypertonic conditions as suggested by Yang et al. (39). Second, the signal transduction from the stimulation of P2Y2 receptor to the production of PGE2 in IMCD appears to be specifically coupled to the COX-1 activity. Evidence for such functional coupling of prostanoid biosynthetic enzymes in various cells does exist (21, 24).' P( k+ R, K* z: @3 \8 I' _% \' Z
% K& x. q- S2 r- }1 u
In conclusion, our study has important physiological significance with regard to the role of purinergic regulation of medullary collecting duct function in conditions of hydration and dehydration. This provides a basis for the operation of AVP-independent regulatory mechanisms that determine the overall function of IMCD in these conditions. Our study also emphasizes the complex nature of the interaction between the purinergic and prostanoid systems and the intracellular coupling pathways involved in such interaction.
. V' W, c) @3 [. z. e) z
9 z% m( t# w- s6 H% _+ T, IGRANTS
/ W* c0 {+ ^/ q K
6 ]) ?; \) \* t5 I; KThis work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-61183 (to B. K. Kishore) and the resources and facilities at the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System. R. Sun received travel awards from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) to present the results at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, Oct.-Nov. 2004, St. Louis, MO, and from International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS) to present the results at the Experimental Biology 2005 meeting in April 2005, San Diego, CA.! c/ A) R& m R3 w5 d5 H
. N/ z3 y; b% f
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS$ I/ ], u$ W, H c1 P7 `9 T7 C
- d# m$ v$ H0 @; Z1 k$ z7 ^: M b
The authors thank Drs. M. Knepper and D. Kohan for a critical reading of the manuscript, and H. Shi for technical assistance. Parts of this work were presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, Oct.-Nov. 2004, St. Louis, MO, and at the Experimental Biology 2005 meeting, April 2005, San Diego, CA.
7 o" z2 V/ M1 G( G9 I7 }+ \- a$ l( R9 X# T$ Y9 r+ Y1 {$ k7 _
FOOTNOTES
/ T3 U# T0 q9 r4 |2 D' X& N2 D: n! {" S# c% q k
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
; d4 ]$ P3 A) c& n& h& L* z- t% k2 S! [( i* a: e
REFERENCES, r A* s$ w0 ]1 q6 L( P { _# k
- y9 Z. e7 ^5 }. {+ y% n: g* L" RBao Y, Pucci ML, Chan BS, Lu R, Ito S, and Schuster VL. Prostaglandin transporter PGT is expressed in cell types that synthesize and release prostanoids. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 282: F1103–F1110, 2002.
1 D3 _% T2 w9 A) O8 z' T
* p2 N1 ]0 ^3 i5 ~* ?Barnett J, Chow J, Ives D, Chiou M, Mackenzie R, Osen E, Nguyen B, Tsing S, Bach C, Freire J, Chan H, Sigal E, and Ramesha C. Purification, characterization and selective inhibition of human prostaglandin G/H synthase 1 and 2 expressed in bacculovirus system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1209: 130–139, 1994.( M% `% U- S2 e: W+ S. t3 m" i
9 j6 X; s5 \6 J1 l ~
Bhattacharyya DK, Lecomte M, Dunn J, Morgans DJ, and Smith WL. Selective inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxidase synthase-1 (cyclooxygenase-1) by valeroyl salicylic acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 317: 19–24, 1995.
' v5 p9 c3 u0 Z$ s1 P% ]7 s9 I. }; r( ~; O1 T+ E/ D
Bonvalet JP, Pradelles P, and Farman N. Segmental synthesis and actions of prostaglandins along the nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 253: F377–F387, 1987.0 o0 a, {: K. @5 Q; X
3 X8 m5 f3 ?! b
Breyer MD and Breyer RD. Prostaglandin receptors: their role in regulating renal function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 9: 23–29, 2000.
3 |# d! }/ k4 U' J, S* ^' l+ I9 W
% t( E9 Z( I# @: ?9 c6 S1 g/ m& `* aCarlson NG. Neuroprotection of cultured cortical neurons mediated by the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor APHS can be reversed by a prostanoid. J Neurosci Res 71: 79–88, 2003.
$ H( k/ V& a+ g! C2 f$ K- F% q6 `7 o: y3 k9 J, O4 Y" H
DiGiovanni SR, Nielsen S, Christensen EI, and Knepper MA. Regulation of collecting duct water channel expression by vasopressin in Brattleboro rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8984–8988, 1994.4 Y9 U( J0 E0 \% Q4 M, F/ _- G/ d1 j
$ [6 c) s( ~# z8 W; m' a$ IDunn MJ and Hood VL. Prostaglandins and the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 233: F169–F184, 1977.* d$ a- T" B2 l7 i" a' h
9 y. [; J! w! u. N/ oEcelbarger CA, Maeda Y, Gibson CC, and Knepper MA. Extracellular ATP increases intracellular calcium in rat terminal collecting duct via a nucleotide receptor. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 267: F998–F1006, 1994.
) }4 A) U( P. r8 M: @+ K3 p3 J/ e6 s9 k; X; k
Edwards RM and Spielman WS. Adenosine A1 receptor-mediated inhibition of vasopressin action in inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F791–F796, 1994.
7 S- c* T# i z
1 Q7 |/ X% L% T r$ r! V Z- |Han JS, Maeda Y, Ecelbarger CA, and Knepper MA. Vasopressin-independent regulation of collecting duct water permeability. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 266: F139–F146, 1994." q: L* n, p! @. Z b$ @9 V- g
( m+ s0 N! M$ d8 _" A( ? V! e9 y. KHarris RC and Breyer MD. Physiological regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F1–F11, 2001.
# s! r }- u$ o: v
, s& N" V `+ J. q2 WHozawa S, Holtzman EJ, and Ausiello DA. cAMP motifs regulating transcription in the aquaporin-2 gene. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 270: C1695–C1702, 1996.
) R4 i9 E/ E* b2 p
( C* G2 T! A1 Y- QInscho EW. Renal microvascular effects of P2 receptor stimulation. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 332–339, 2001.
4 a2 L4 [; | g' \# ~) y6 `
( I4 l7 W! B9 ~6 P, f; q! PJackson BA. Prostaglandin E2 synthesis in the inner medullary collecting duct of the rat: implications for vasopressin-dependent cyclic AMP formation. J Cell Physiol 129: 60–64, 1986.* C; w B) b" @' B0 D
/ @4 `3 A6 f7 y. K0 A* B' a
Kishore BK, Chou CL, and Knepper MA. Extracellular nucleotide receptor inhibits AVP-stimulated water permeability in inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 269: F863–F869, 1995.4 y( M! Z+ _! w" V
/ ~6 ?$ @ |$ e8 T' s5 f7 L1 `1 GKishore BK, Ginns SM, Krane CM, Nielsen S, and Knepper MA. Cellular localization of P2Y2 receptor in rat renal medulla and lung. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F43–F51, 2000.0 h5 y+ s5 Z* X! [ I0 R6 a5 Y; a
" v! f& \9 |9 P2 W8 gKishore BK, Krane CM, Miller RL, Shi H, Zhang P, Hemmert A, Sun R, and Nelson RD. P2Y2 receptor mRNA and protein expression is altered in inner medullas of hydrated and dehydrated rats: relevance to AVP-independent regulation of IMCD function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F1164–F1172, 2005.
, L/ l8 V! R# }7 J. Z
. x3 [2 [% N" w- W- BKishore BK, Wade JB, Schorr K, Inoue T, Mandon B, and Knepper MA. Expression of synaptotagmin VIII in rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275: F131–F142, 1998.
3 J; j# u; n7 q, n( s3 T
6 o5 \4 ]; G/ W: q" qKohan DE and Hughe K. Autocrine role of endothelin in rat IMCD: inhibition of AVP-induced cAMP accumulation. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 265: F126–F129, 1993.% s7 }3 ^0 G0 k( h* O1 k$ y
" Y& s& C* h3 ^1 S) H0 C; M8 R6 a
Kudo I and Murakami M. Diverse functional coupling of prostanoid biosynthetic enzymes in various cell types. Adv Exp Med Biol 469: 29–35, 1999.5 ^3 A _8 [+ C$ }0 S8 ?; d! f
( ~) p+ w2 R3 D! \! nLeipziger J, Bailey MA, and Unwin RJ. Purinergic receptors in the kidney. In: Purinergic Receptors and Signaling, edited by Schwiebert EM. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2003, p. 369–394.# L( @* g" i, a. X+ v7 k+ @7 j
/ Q5 P* ]5 |) g+ I/ @Matsumura Y, Uchida S, Rai T, Sasaki S, and Marumo F. Transcriptional regulation of aquaporin-2 water channel gene by cAMP. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 861–867, 1997.) R; w( c0 i0 u# T$ Q$ ]: v
) H ^* y0 b: E! v) F" y$ HMurakami M, Kambe T, Shimbara S, and Kudo I. Functional coupling between various phospholipase A2s and cyclooxygenases in immediate and delayed prostanoid biosynthetic pathways. J Biol Chem 274: 3103–3115, 1999.
$ Y4 B0 j6 a V8 P& V/ U" H! w+ ~0 H, Z9 V' ^5 ?4 `
Nadler SP, Zimpelmann JA, and Hebert RL. PGE2 inhibits water permeability at a post-cAMP site in rat terminal inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F229–F235, 1992.
+ b/ a; F9 p1 h, U$ E r$ R3 e! a) T+ v+ S- U E8 J/ F
Nielsen S, Chou CL, Marples D, Christensen EI, Kishore BK, and Knepper MA. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1013–1017, 1995.
7 k. s9 Y& Y- q4 Q# E- Y$ Q1 r4 Q* }
* A. X* E, M8 T1 f( S! DNielsen S, DiGiovanni SR, Christensen EI, Knepper MA, and Harris HW. Cellular and subcellular immunolocalization of vasopressin-regulated water channel in rat kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 11663–11667, 1993.
$ w( a* q& M- m8 {
5 q7 E9 C* U/ q- k6 X3 QRoman RJ and Lechene C. Prostaglandin E2 and F2 reduced urea reabsorption from the rat collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 241: F53–F60, 1981.: R; a, Q% w0 [4 `
' x5 o0 n2 d$ k) f. aRouch AJ and Kudo LH. Role of PGE2 in 2-induced inhibition of AVP- and cAMP-stimulated H2O, Na , and urea transport in rat IMCD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F294–F301, 2000.- \, i- |. T& ]# C
2 H# Z+ r+ \5 X6 O% j) SSchwiebert EM. ATP release mechanisms, ATP receptors and purinergic signaling along the nephron. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 340–350, 2001., I; K" }+ a& R
* P8 c% G6 U6 A5 e
Schwiebert EM and Kishore BK. Extracellular nucleotide signaling along the renal epithelium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F945–F963, 2001.) W. b# _5 |) g0 w$ M# z2 W
- N7 O. G- A! K S b7 X# BSchwiebert EM and Zsembery A. Extracellular ATP as a signaling molecule for epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1615: 7–32, 2003.8 z0 J {/ R9 O7 q
" M8 D# a# U9 b0 UTeitelbaum I. Hormone signaling systems in inner medullary collecting ducts. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 263: F985–F990, 1992.; y# r0 f4 T* w0 V" I4 {) M4 q, k
9 c" e( P0 U+ R) Z$ ?- tTerris J, Ecelbarger CA, Nielsen S, and Knepper MA. Long-term regulation of four renal aquaporins in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 271: F414–F422, 1996.
O, u) o' k2 w2 m
- n' j+ ?8 C" p7 T( AUnwin RJ, Bailey MA, and Burnstock G. Purinergic signaling along the renal tubule: the current state of play. News Physiol Sci 18: 237–241, 2003.9 j! z4 b b4 U! Q, O/ Y( P! {
( @" \) F9 S( I( r6 @0 A/ h
Welch BD, Carlson NG, Shi H, Myatt L, and Kishore BK. P2Y2 receptor-stimulated release of prostaglandin E2 by rat inner medullary collecting duct preparations. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F711–F721, 2003.
+ E7 P: X' q! w: j2 S" u8 l8 K0 \5 y5 r" u3 W+ ^: [" f
Xia SL, Wang L, Cash MN, Teng X, Schwalbe RA, and Wingo CS. Extracellular ATP-induced calcium signaling in mIMCD-3 cells requires both P2X and P2Y purinoceptors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287: F204–F214, 2004.) h% n; t& T+ v1 b* h" t- K
" b0 `+ {6 b7 k" j& O S+ W
Yagil Y. Interaction of adenosine with vasopressin in the inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 259: F679–F687, 1990.6 i" t: {6 L1 X0 f) j
- D- O2 v' h' j; {$ C) Z4 Y% E
Yang T, Huang Y, Heasley LE, Berl T, and Schnermann JB. MAPK mediation of hypertonicity-stimulated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in renal medullary collecting duct cells. J Biol Chem 275: 23281–23286, 2000., _. d; C5 ]" w! G# M& s
$ B" o# @1 \, c2 O! aYang T, Schnermann JB, and Briggs JP. Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in renal medulla by tonicity in vivo and in vitro. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F1–F9, 1999.
9 a4 h0 X! o+ I" Q0 x/ L& Y
5 p; z$ b$ W) }) j0 M; A. _& ZYasui M, Zelenina SM, Celsi G, and Aperia A. Adenylate cyclase-coupled vasopressin receptor activates AQP2 promoter via a dual effect on CRE and AP1 elements. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 272: F442–F450, 1997.; A5 N8 _- x* H& O# E7 x
! Z: X$ H' b0 I( b3 _7 hZelenina M, Christensen BM, Palmér J, Narin AC, Nielsen S, and Aperia A. Prostaglandin E2 interaction with AVP: effect on AQP2 phosphorylation and distribution. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F388–F394, 2000.(Rujia Sun, Noel G. Carlso) |
|
发表于 2009-4-21 13:05
