|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-9 10:21 编辑
" s9 J: B k$ y
6 W3 [* m% n, a% C$ f% `The apparent use of sarin to kill more than 1,400 civilians in2 O) v4 G! k# W9 Z. |
Damascus on 21 August may highlight the limits of the Chemical4 ^# g7 t: C8 ]- u2 ]
Weapons Convention (CWC) — but that does not mean that
; q/ U) G$ F- g: Nthe world can afford to turn its back on such treaties." j+ F& J4 J u5 O$ n
The role of international treaties in restricting the proliferation of! ?6 Y( v8 s& w- F
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons has not had a good press in
) W u/ U! B3 q" srecent years. Conventional wisdom tends to scorn the value of such% Q5 b* Z: B5 r. ?- b8 z
‘pieces of paper’ in real politick. Critics from both the left and the right4 W t8 Y; H3 O8 n2 k( F9 C
heap derision on their selective reach and implementation.8 Y2 B/ p# }2 z: }) L& ~' a1 B* g
Yet these treaties are crucial to everyone who is interested in making
- m1 H( N% {1 d, L2 G: ]wars less barbaric and less frequent. Pieces of paper they may be, but( E4 F& n5 w3 |8 D
large powers adhere to their contents with care, as do the smaller ones' T/ M# \( v& r
who crave international respectability.
7 p. }' B/ ]: K0 K6 i
- g1 d+ | U( H* Z* _ [: {- r9 d! \1 P, d
[hide][/hide] |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-5 17:01
发表于 2013-9-5 21:10
