|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-9 10:21 编辑
3 J; Z8 F2 c) E- ]' z$ C' q: G2 d
& m2 V+ U, x6 _4 V8 rThe apparent use of sarin to kill more than 1,400 civilians in
* ]$ o6 v1 M6 U/ G7 HDamascus on 21 August may highlight the limits of the Chemical
' ^1 H; N* P A( L8 KWeapons Convention (CWC) — but that does not mean that! h0 O! R. n, J/ b0 Z
the world can afford to turn its back on such treaties.2 Q' j- i: C1 ? [! y* i% i
The role of international treaties in restricting the proliferation of
+ m7 ?. H* j! |; T$ I3 P. Y1 ?nuclear, chemical and biological weapons has not had a good press in& J3 X" C- G( `8 i- N. \
recent years. Conventional wisdom tends to scorn the value of such1 b, h& S0 w% E; S9 w8 S! X E
‘pieces of paper’ in real politick. Critics from both the left and the right2 l8 I. n* `. R) \- h9 ^
heap derision on their selective reach and implementation.
3 A6 O. i9 J/ j8 |6 i$ TYet these treaties are crucial to everyone who is interested in making
& q1 o6 q. @4 z4 O5 m owars less barbaric and less frequent. Pieces of paper they may be, but
- k5 x3 ~: L0 M0 E$ Mlarge powers adhere to their contents with care, as do the smaller ones( D# M# ]9 L# X3 @
who crave international respectability.
" I8 N0 }) o6 t) O! |- B* O" ]
q9 O6 N) a! A) T- G3 o1 B$ Y! k( Y5 T& e, U: }
[hide][/hide] |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-5 17:01
发表于 2013-9-5 21:10
