|

- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|

本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-9 10:21 编辑 : q" e$ W; j' q6 P/ }, Y
5 y% ~* v: e, s! u* i) {- aThe apparent use of sarin to kill more than 1,400 civilians in
) j+ a2 d; Z" |% QDamascus on 21 August may highlight the limits of the Chemical- I7 K. M; {1 b
Weapons Convention (CWC) — but that does not mean that; `9 C& f6 c# V) o6 |( E7 g! \; t( _
the world can afford to turn its back on such treaties.. T( J2 [- }& s' ~2 F
The role of international treaties in restricting the proliferation of
* a* N$ _4 a" \9 bnuclear, chemical and biological weapons has not had a good press in1 |1 Q m% P3 W/ F
recent years. Conventional wisdom tends to scorn the value of such
! a+ X$ o9 y2 a- Y‘pieces of paper’ in real politick. Critics from both the left and the right
; t% D! Q+ W& B' @, C& t, K- pheap derision on their selective reach and implementation.* I) g t; a* W( [. z' I
Yet these treaties are crucial to everyone who is interested in making
: F7 `* N4 {7 J. n* `& {, a; m: x% Bwars less barbaric and less frequent. Pieces of paper they may be, but! Y6 \: v8 ?6 N+ }
large powers adhere to their contents with care, as do the smaller ones
2 n$ a& ?$ m+ w8 nwho crave international respectability.
V; ^+ b& k$ O% r& g: l d) k: Z+ [# O5 }. P
) i0 T' |, i* h' j" C9 o
[hide][/hide] |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?注册
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|