干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站

 

 

搜索
朗日生物

免疫细胞治疗专区

欢迎关注干细胞微信公众号

  
查看: 532988|回复: 261
go

Nucleostemin Is a Marker of Proliferating Stromal Stem Cells in Adult Human Bone [复制链接]

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
威望
0  
包包
483  
楼主
发表于 2009-3-5 00:07 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览 |打印
作者:Wael Kafienah, Sanjay Mistry, Christopher Williams, Anthony P. Hollander作者单位:Academic Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Science at North Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom : @& I4 s" f$ b# p& T2 C. f; t3 ?
                  0 H  t6 f4 x9 d
                  
. j) o+ _7 ?/ M- a, P          9 f/ Q1 g. a' q
                         " W* v# ~' H7 Q! K0 k. i
            + g. T$ V1 R  x0 [& S; i# ]" i  X6 Y
            % v  J; w- p# X* C+ W
            4 N: _$ {  ]# {! R8 X1 J
            
: p4 [, |- X3 ?: y. O5 D3 ]                     
, J7 C9 ^" p4 x. r9 U4 W2 A6 q        $ W9 j* V  ~! G7 H# ^, ?. I
        ( `, @. H$ I; s6 i7 U, t# \( ~
        2 N/ d5 I  n8 a& f3 F7 l2 P$ T% R
          【摘要】( e$ O% S7 X! Q; T  q3 O! |
      The identification of stem cell¨Cspecific proteins and the elucidation of their novel regulatory pathways may help in the development of protocols for control of their self-renewal and differentiation for cell-based therapies. Nucleostemin is a recently discovered nucleolar protein predominantly associated with proliferating rat neural and embryonic stem cells, and some human cancer cell lines. A comprehensive study of nucleostemin in human adult bone marrow stem cells is lacking. The aim of the study was to determine if nucleostemin is synthesized by adult bone marrow stem cells and to analyze its expression during their expansion and differentiation. Using a multipotential adherent population of stem cells, nucleostemin was localized to the nucleoli and occurred in 43.3% of the cells. There was a high level of expression of nucleostemin mRNA in bone marrow stem cells and this remained unchanged over time during cell expansion in culture. When bone marrow stem cells were stimulated to proliferate by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2, nucleostemin expression increased in a dose-dependent manner. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of nucleostemin abolished the proliferative effect of FGF-2. When bone marrow stem cells were differentiated into chondrocytes, adipocytes, or osteocytes, nucleostemin expression was 70%¨C90% lower than in the undifferentiated cells retained in monolayer culture. We conclude that nucleostemin is a marker of undifferentiated human adult bone marrow stem cells and that it is involved in the regulation of proliferation of these cells. 5 m% R7 ]# p& _" ~) O
          【关键词】 Nucleostemin Stem cell Bone marrow Tissue engineering
% P  H; d0 ]* m0 `" N                  INTRODUCTION( r' _" o% k7 O4 \+ K: i/ u& _
4 q& x! v4 ~8 S% p# p( H  D- z
Stem cells are present throughout embryonic development as well as in several organs of the adult .+ Q) H8 j: c. _7 V( V

/ v3 ]& P4 O6 N' E, s% g6 L/ oIsolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells has been attempted by several investigators using a variety of techniques including plastic adherence .
$ w) |; J) Q7 E/ F  V+ S( r/ x* B
Recent reports suggest that some cytokines can enhance the proliferation and the differentiation potential of BMSCs . The mechanism(s) by which FGF-2 modulates its proliferative activity in BMSCs remains unclear.- W& r7 U2 W1 K
+ Y  y  h( T, D& [, {) m& j
The identification of stem cell¨Cspecific proteins and the elucidation of their novel regulatory pathways may help in the development of protocols for control of their self-renewal and differentiation .
' V( ?6 J. v8 a+ `1 w! l0 k! E1 Y/ ^, M
The aim of the present study was to determine if nucleostemin is synthesized by adult human BMSCs and to analyze its expression during the expansion and differentiation of the bone marrow stem cell population.
# q: `. w. @3 {3 [6 i
% o( \) S  R" }# i' [MATERIALS AND METHODS! ~3 o1 m) U% F* H

5 g, r, Y6 u; F+ L8 s% lIsolation and Expansion of BMSCs
/ d5 D# r' G0 \9 T, G" S
; l: h& {4 n2 I! cBMSCs were harvested from bone marrow plugs taken from the femoral heads of five patients (two men, three women; mean age, 53.8 years; range, 31¨C79) undergoing hip replacement. All patients gave their informed consent and the study was carried out according to local ethical guidelines. Cells were suspended in stem cell medium consisting of low glucose Dulbecco¡¯s modified Eagle¡¯s medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, http://www.hyclone.com), 1% (vol/vol) Glutamax (1x; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, http://www.invitrogen.com), and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (P/S; Invitrogen). The serum batch was selected to promote the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells . The cell suspension was separated from any bone in the sample by repeated washing with media, the suspension being drawn off using a 20-ml syringe and 19-gauge needle. The cells were centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes, and the supernatant/fat was removed. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in medium and then plated at a seeding density of 5¨C10 million cells per 75-cm2 flask. These flasks were incubated at 37¡ãC in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Four days were allowed before the first medium change, and then the medium was changed every other day until adherent cells reached 90% confluence and were ready for passaging.
9 ~+ T# {+ ]  H3 E, R3 G: P- h
' h' [8 C4 W# P' X. i* a% {' sMultilineage Differentiation
0 c; G& L# N5 w# o$ E# k. q4 e+ U4 i; t7 k
All the cells used for multilineage differentiation assays were expanded as described above without FGF-2. For osteogenic differentiation . Parallel experiments using pellets of differentiated mature articular chondrocytes were treated under the same conditions acting as a control.' B/ U- K( e: X- a7 R0 m
$ j) ^/ I8 d" z* d/ o  Y' l; i) l/ a
Analysis of Surface Epitope by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
, l5 c2 O3 s8 M& k. r( h
  ?- K$ K# l# Z# GThe cells were suspended in PBS at a concentration of about 100,000 cells/ml, fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde at 4¡ãC for 10 minutes, and washed with PBS. Nonspecific antigens were blocked by incubating the cells at room temperature for 1 hour in a blocking solution containing 1% (wt/vol) BSA, 5% (vol/vol) FCS (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10% (vol/vol) human serum (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were washed by centrifugation in three volumes of PBS, and the cell pellet was suspended in 100 µl of a primary antibody solution containing 20¨C100 µg/ml of antibody in blocking solution. After incubation for 40 minutes at 4¡ãC, the cells were washed in PBS. All the primary antibodies were mouse anti-human, obtained from R&D Systems. For an isotype control, non-specific mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) was substituted for the primary antibody. For antibodies that required a second antibody for detection, the cell pellet was incubated under the same conditions for 20 minutes with anti-mouse IgG labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark, http://www.dakocytomation.com). The cells were then washed in PBS and suspended in 1 ml of PBS for analysis on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, http://www.bd.com). Positive expression was defined as the level of fluorescence greater than 95% of corresponding isotype-matched control antibodies.
2 P3 ^5 c4 A; |
, {. j$ ]0 v" B; R: W( tImmunocytochemistry: O" [" m: S. B( {  }5 M/ l8 A: f

1 g) ~7 j" t9 v- M$ ]2 WCells from passages 2 or 3 in culture were used for cytospins. The slides were left to air-dry then were washed three times in wash solution consisting of 0.5% (vol/vol) Tween and 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS. Cells were fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 minutes. The cells were blocked and permeablized for 45 minutes at room temperature using a blocking solution consisting of 1% (w/v) BSA, 10% (vol/vol) donkey serum, and 0.2% (vol/vol) Saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. The slides were washed three times then incubated with the primary antibody solution overnight at 4¡ãC. The antibodies used were goat anti-human for nucleostemin (R&D Systems), mouse anti-human for nucleoli (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, http://www.chemicon.com), and goat or mouse IgG for isotype control (Sigma-Aldrich). The slides were washed three times then incubated with Rhodamine Red-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, http://www.jacksonimmuno.com) for 1 hour at 37¡ãC. The cells were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) stain (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, http://www.vectorlabs.com) then mounted. Nucleostemin-positive cells were counted in samples from five patients by two independent investigators spanning fields of more than 100 cells for each sample.
5 P" Z7 M( Z  |; M6 r$ _' Z5 E% I( B) k6 D
Cell Proliferation Analysis
  j; ~9 {& r8 {
0 S2 \9 @# f) M. s# RCells from passages 2 or 3 were seeded at a density of 1,000 cells/well into 96-well plates (in triplicate) in expansion medium containing 2% (vol/vol) FBS. Cells were treated with various concentrations of FGF-2 as indicated in Results for 72 hours. Control wells containing 2% or 10% (vol/vol) FBS were used. Cell proliferation was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (inner salt) (MTS) assays performed according to the manufacturer¡¯s instructions (CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay; Promega, Madison, WI, http://www.promega.com). A linear standard curve with a range of 325¨C12,500 cells was included on every plate. Cells from parallel plate cultures were harvested for nucleostemin mRNA analysis as explained under RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription below. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times." w- @* D6 n1 a' g, K

4 a5 A7 c8 o% J' nsiRNA Knockdown Analysis, ^$ E, a* E/ }. E( @& z0 h7 ~% y
2 [1 n* M! S6 X/ j$ p$ O6 n" z9 d* ~
siRNA (50 pmol) was introduced into cells by complexing with Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen). The transfected cultures were incubated with FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) for 72 hours then the cells were analyzed for proliferation using the MTS assay (Promega) or harvested for nucleostemin mRNA analysis using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Transfection efficiency and cell viability were optimized using BLOCK-iT Fluorescent Oligos (Invitrogen). The resultant transfection efficiency and cell viability were both > 90%. Stealth Select RNAi sequence (Invitrogen) specific for the three variants of human nucleostemin was used in the experiments. The sequence was as follows: human nucleostemin-specific siRNA, ACAACUUGCAUGCUCCUUG-UAAGCC; Stealth RNAi Med GC sequence was used as negative control.
: G$ f& I& R6 v: Q% Y$ A! g& f1 }3 C, ^  Y9 {
RNA Isolation and RT/ p8 ^4 Q0 ^, K; g
  _2 i' W* I7 j& k; a, ]
RNA was extracted from cell cultures using the SV Total RNA Purification kit (Promega), according to the manufacturers instructions. RT was carried out using the Superscript II system (Invitrogen). Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed in a 20-µl reaction volume containing Superscript II (0.2 U), random primer (225 ng/µl), dNTP (0.5 mM each), and RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor (2 U/µl) at 37¡ãC for 42 minutes.
) w) t! ?0 ]# H" C! E, S1 |
5 l6 V* V3 ?6 d, B$ QPrimer Design  U$ ^, r5 `- ]' `, O: M

6 K( m7 \3 j3 h9 TThe coding sequence for human nucleostemin gene (GenBank accession no. NM_014366  were used as a reference in all RT-PCR reactions and as a means of quantifying levels of nucleostemin expression by normalization to ß-actin. These primers had been specifically designed to not coamplify processed ß-actin pseudogenes in contaminating genomic DNA. All the primers generated the correct sizes of the PCR fragments with no nonspecific products, confirming the specificity of the real time RT-PCR (data not shown). The primer sequences for nucleostemin were as follows: forward primer, 5'-GGGAAGATAACCAAGCGTGTG-3'; reverse primer, 5'-CCTCCAAGAAGTTTCCAAAGG-3'; product size, 98 bp. The primer sequences for ß-actin were as follows: forward primer, 5'-GACAGGATGCAGAAGGAGATTACT-3'; reverse primer, 5'-TGATCCACATCTGC TGGAAGGT-3'; product size, 141 bp.
$ F! a% e4 f0 O
* ^! V6 Q  X. \1 ?8 [+ B; aQuantitative Real-Time RT-PCR
9 w- s% B* v' z* x9 g5 R
4 j6 {/ i" e3 K3 K* i; LQuantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed in a 25-µl reaction volume containing 12.5 µl of the SYBR Green PCR master mix (Takara, Otsu, Japan, http://www.takara.co.jp), 5 µl of the RT reaction mixture, and 300 nM primers using the Smart Cycler II System (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, http://www.cepheid.com). For the ß-actin gene, the RT reaction mixture was diluted 100 times. The amplification program consisted of initial denaturation of 95¡ãC (2 minutes) followed by 40 cycles of 95¡ãC (15 seconds), annealing at 58¡ãC (30 seconds), and extension at 72¡ãC (15 seconds). After amplification, melt analysis was performed by heating the reaction mixture from 60¨C95¡ãC at a rate of 0.2¡ãC per second. The cycle threshold (Ct) value for each gene (X) of interest was measured for each RT sample. The Ct value for ß-actin was used as an endogenous reference for normalization. The relative transcript level of a given gene (X) at a given treatment time point (T) over its value at the initial treatment time (0) was calculated as 2¨CCt, in which Ct = CtT ¨C Ct0; CtT = CtT,X ¨C CtT and Ct0 = Ct0,X ¨C Ct0,ß. Real time RT-PCR assays were done in duplicate or triplicate and repeated two to four times.
2 W& x! u0 u* O( `, {  M
  b5 [7 d/ C3 W1 P( a$ HRESULTS
* q  L- p& ]# @% q
5 j! t) R! n- Z7 k& I" |Phenotype and Multilineage Potential of Isolated BMSCs
" O" G) M# s2 {9 a6 o
# Q" N+ w1 S" l- U& Y- NCells were positively selected for their ability to adhere to plastic substrate. Adherent cells from passages 2 or 3 were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to assess the preparation quality and the phenotypic cell surface markers associated with stem cells. The cells resulting after plating were positive for CD105, CD49a, CD117, bone morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR)-1A, STRO-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1A. The population was negative for CD34. The median value and range of each marker are shown in Table 1. To assess the multipotentiality of the prepared BMSCs, they were assayed for their adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic capacities. All the samples differentiated into each of the three phenotypes (Fig. 1, n = 5). The addition of chondrogenic medium to pellet cultures resulted in tissue rich in proteoglycans (Fig. 1A) and type II collagen (Fig. 1B). The quality of the resulting pellets was comparable with that of control pellets grown using mature articular chondrocytes. When the undifferentiated BMSCs were incubated in adipogenic medium, the cells contained Oil Red-O¨Cstaining vacuoles and expressed the fatty acid binding protein typical of adipocytes (Fig. 1C, 1D). Similarly, the incubation of undifferentiated BMSCs with osteogenic medium resulted in cultures rich in mineral and expressing osteocalcin, typical of osteoblasts (Fig. 1E, 1F). There was no significant variation in the extent of differentiation among the patient samples, indicating that the BMSC population used was consistently multipotent.0 m5 H3 b/ \1 r5 e5 V

$ z; R! G9 a6 R3 oTable 1. Phenotypic cell surface markers of BMSCs
/ M, a( ~, k5 I' u  f3 W3 k& n; N
Figure 1. Multilineage potential of the bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) population. In (A) and (B), expanded BMSCs from passages 2 or 3 were incubated under chondrogenic conditions for 21 days. Parallel cultures using mature chondrocytes were used as controls. Proteoglycans (A) were measured as glycosaminoglycans using a colorimetric assay, and type II collagen (B) was measured using an immunoassay. The results are expressed as a percentage of dry weight. Each bar is the mean ¡À standard error of the mean from five experiments. In (C) and (D), cells were incubated in adipogenic medium for 14 days. Fat droplets in the cells were stained with Oil Red-O (C). Fatty acid binding protein was immunostained using Rhodamine Red secondary antibody (D). In (E) and (F), cells were incubated in osteogenic medium for 14 days. The mineral in the cultures was detected by staining with Alizarin Red (E). Osteocalcin was immunostained using Rhodamine Red secondary antibody (F). Magnification = x 100 for (C¨CF).
# W3 l& f1 f/ c0 L( v( j
: s1 a& ]; _3 g  X: PNucleolar Localization of Nucleostemin in BMSCs0 n* T: z! P2 y7 ^- q

3 A- _1 }- R* {. N8 Q& z0 xWe investigated if the human BMSC population contains nucleostemin-positive cells. Using immunofluorescence localization, there was a strong signal for nucleostemin protein in the nucleoli of adult human BMSCs (Fig. 2). Some cells showed a more diffuse nucleoplasmic distribution. The mean frequency of BMSCs expressing nucleostemin was 43.4% (range, 26%¨C55%; n = 5). The analysis was carried out on passage 2 or later of these cultures to avoid any potential contamination by hematopoietic stem cells.
' |4 a3 W9 k, T' i: y" R5 Q* Z; `. f5 ^) o! g1 G# L) \
Figure 2. Nucleolar localization of nucleostemin in bone marrow stromal cells. Cells from passages 2 or 3 were cytospun, fixed in methanol, and permeabilized by Saponin. The slides were stained with goat anti-nucleostemin antibody (A), normal goat serum (B), or goat anti-nucleolus antibody (C). A Rhodamine Red¨Cconjugated secondary antibody was used. The nuclei were counterstained blue with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole stain. Magnification = x 100.
* ]1 ]5 R* E# q1 i
. a+ R! S8 C1 r' FExpression of Nucleostemin mRNA in Expanded Adult Human BMSCs
3 M" q4 E  J1 u+ M: }$ ^+ \
0 K" q# ^& k8 |" \! P8 h, }In order to analyze nucleostemin mRNA expression in BMSCs, we have devised a sensitive real-time RT-PCR method for quantifying the nucleostemin message in human cells. The lowest detectable template concentration was 8.5 pg/ml corresponding to a threshold cycle Ct of 36.6, and the highest detectable template concentration was 85 ng/ml corresponding to a Ct of 23.5 (data not shown). In order to estimate the stability of nucleostemin expression in BMSCs over time, RNA was quantified in expanded cells from passages 1¨C3 over a period of 5 weeks. Relative quantitative RT-PCR at each passage revealed no significant change in the expression of nucleostemin over time (Table 2).: \2 q. @$ a5 O0 n: `* L! ~, k/ Q

) H; U$ \* J+ x( n) f; }1 y: WTable 2. Expression of nucleostemin mRNA in bone marrow stromal cells" `0 @% Y8 ~& r
( J* o$ w) d. b0 B# q
Regulation of Nucleostemin Expression in BMSCs by FGF-2
, H/ F9 s: T: K( f: X2 E1 ?# [! k$ U5 ^$ N
FGF-2 increases the proliferation of BMSCs in vitro . To determine whether nucleostemin expression is influenced by FGF-2 stimulation, BMSCs were cultured in the presence of varying concentrations of FGF-2. The results show a dose-response relationship between nucleostemin expression and FGF-2 concentration (Fig. 3). The use of FGF-2 at 10 ng/ml led to a high and significant greater nucleostemin mRNA expression than with lower concentrations of the growth factor. To assess the relationship of nucleostemin expression with FGF-2, cells were transfected with a small inhibitory RNA sequence specific to nucleostemin prior to FGF-2 stimulation. This sequence was shown to downregulate nucleostemin expression in FGF-2¨Cstimulated and unstimulated control cells by 73% and 62%, respectively, relative to cells transfected with scrambled siRNA sequence (Fig. 4A). This tool allowed for assessing the functional relationship of FGF-2¨Cstimulated proliferation and nucleostemin expression in BMSCs. The introduction of siRNA in cultures of FGF-2¨Cstimulated proliferating cells resulted in a significant lower cell number compared with control cells transfected with the scrambled siRNA sequence (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, nucleostemin-specific siRNA introduced into control cultures incubated with 2% (vol/vol) FBS without FGF-2 did not influence their level of proliferation and was comparable with the scrambled siRNA control sequence. These experiments demonstrate that the specific knockdown of nucleostemin mRNA results in lower FGF-2-driven proliferation of BMSCs.' Y4 e# z& S/ w0 v

5 A" F3 p3 |: {Figure 3. Dose-response relationship between FGF-2 and nucleoste-min expression. Total RNA was extracted from bone marrow stromal cells cultured with varying concentrations of FGF-2 in the presence of 2% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 72 hours. The level of relative expression of nucleostemin was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as described in Materials and Methods. The expression level of nucleostemin for cells incubated with 10% FBS alone was set as 100%. Each point is the mean ¡À standard error of the mean from five experiments; groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance, and the dose-response trend was significant (p # b7 a3 y' t' x3 w, x
/ n. s% r" s6 Y2 R
Figure 4. Nucleostemin siRNA knockdown studies in FGF-2-stimulated proliferating bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Nucleostemin-specific siRNA or its scrambled sequence was introduced into BMSCs that were then incubated with 2% (vol/vol) FBS only (2% FBS) or with 2% FBS plus 10 ng/ml FGF-2. After 72 hours, total RNA was extracted from cells for measuring nucleostemin mRNA (A), or cells were counted using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (inner salt) assay (B). The relative expression of nucleostemin was determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription¨Cpolymerase chain reaction as described in Materials and Methods. The expression level of nucleostemin transfected with the scrambled siRNA was taken as 100%. Each bar is the mean ¡À standard error of the mean from five experiments; groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. *, p . A  q5 ?( B( u" P! E

& a2 _# c! k: {4 p3 yDifferential Expression of Nucleostemin Before and After BMSC Differentiation
; p# f& |. W; T0 z" q, p  d5 Y, h6 R5 o. c
Nucleostemin has been shown to be downregulated in mature and terminally differentiated cells compared with their precursor central nervous system stem cells . To investigate the expression profile of nucleostemin before and after differentiation in BMSCs, these cells were differentiated into chondrocytes, adipocytes, and osteocytes using well established methods. RNA extracted from the differentiated cells was used to quantify levels of nucleostemin using real-time RT-PCR. The results show a significantly lower nucleostemin expression level in the differentiating cells than in undifferentiated BMSCs expanded in monolayer (Fig. 5).. p+ B5 i9 Q% s
% p4 x5 z! g$ u2 u& w" W
Figure 5. Expression of nucleostemin in differentiated stem cells. Total RNA was extracted from bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) in monolayer (undifferentiated) or BMSCs differentiated into the chondrogenic, osteogenic, or adipogenic lineages. The levels of relative expression of nucleostemin were determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as described in Materials and Methods. The expression level of nucleostemin in monolayer was taken as 100%. Each bar is the mean ¡À standard error of the mean from five experiments; groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. **, p
* x% G! R9 Z* k) g! @6 l
1 A( l& c1 ]3 o5 \DISCUSSION# [% J4 k8 j" A$ A: n& I

) f. B$ b3 p1 f1 S6 \We have shown, for the first time, that nucleostemin is persistently expressed in adult human BMSCs, that this expression is lost upon differentiation in vitro, and that nucleostemin upregulation by FGF-2 is required for this growth factor to increase stem cell proliferation.
8 r9 N" [, X/ M/ W8 |( X
, d/ Z" i* e/ a3 o6 K: u8 t) E# C' kWe used a population of BMSCs positively selected for its adherence to plastic and its growth in a selected batch of FBS known to enrich and maintain multipotential stem cells in the bone marrow . That population was relatively rich in CD105 and CD49a and contained variable levels of other cell surface markers associated with multipotential stem cell populations. More importantly, the population had the capacity to differentiate, in all samples studied, into three mesenchymal lineages with high efficiency. Taken together, these results demonstrate the enrichment for a self-renewing, functional stem cell population in the bone marrow with minimal specific lineage commitment.4 `9 M& Z( ]! q5 n7 H
: n& t. Z7 _% u) D$ v4 U9 K% Q* Z& `
Baddoo et al. , it is clear that nucleostemin expression in the population studied is associated with a more abundant cell population, more likely to be committed progenitors with multipotential.& P9 @( g# A1 M/ q2 [. G
# n1 O  }: U, @; k1 H5 `
The expression of nucleostemin in human BMSCs was persistent over a long period of time in culture. Whether this level of expression continues throughout the late life span of these cells remains to be investigated. Previous studies suggested that controlled high levels of this protein would contribute to the continued proliferation and self-renewal of stem cells and cancer cells . The relatively high expression of nucleostemin in human BMSCs may reflect the presence of an actively proliferating, self-renewing subpopulation in the bone marrow.
( e* H& ?7 z; s, B5 A
  q6 f/ l4 D  `- [Our results demonstrate that the effect of FGF-2 on the expression of nucleostemin in BMSCs is dose dependent. siRNA studies confirmed that this relationship is direct and functional because inhibiting nucleostemin expression results in neutralizing the proliferative effect of FGF-2. A recent study revealed the lack of a clear gene-expression pattern that correlates with the marked mitogenic effect of FGF-2 in BMSCs . Given the vital role nucleostemin plays in stem cell proliferation induced by FGF-2, it will be important to determine if this growth factor increases the frequency of nucleostemin-positive cells.
4 i8 M' ?5 S3 O; @4 H. j4 ?/ B! o) u' n, |6 R+ ]+ }$ s
The use of well established differentiation methods provided us with the means to determine if nucleostemin is specifically associated with the undifferentiated phenotype of BMSCs. The results clearly show the significant loss of nucleostemin expression upon differentiation in vitro. This is in agreement with studies of rodent stem cells, showing the downregulation of nucleostemin in mature and terminally differentiated cells compared with their precursor neural stem cells . We have used quantitative mRNA analysis to establish an accurate evaluation of nucleostemin expression during differentiation. In the future, a more detailed study of nucleostemin protein in differentiated cells may be required to compare its stability and function with that in undifferentiated stem cells.* E0 R3 u8 }! Y" G

6 h4 r: S8 y6 X' o7 d, ?; jThe molecular program(s) regulating the transition of stem cells between the actively dividing and differentiated states remain unclear. A step toward elucidating this program involves the understanding of signals that control the activity of nucleostemin. TGF-ß, which we used to drive the differentiation of stem cells into chondrocytes in our chondrogenesis model, has been previously shown to selectively inhibit the growth of stem cells . Our data therefore suggest that the growth-arresting properties of TGF-ß may be mediated through down-regulation of nucleostemin either directly or through downstream molecules in the TGF-ß signaling pathway. Although it is not clear how adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation leads to nucleostemin inhibition, this multi-tissue loss of expression suggests an integral role for nucleostemin in BMSC proliferation.
4 D) a: Q' k& Z% q+ S9 r
6 E1 F$ y4 h9 [1 s* c+ SACKNOWLEDGMENTS7 K  \) d' g3 R# B. g* U9 ^" X
9 k; E1 g, `, t+ x
This work was funded by grants from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the UK Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC). A.P.H. is funded in part by an endowed chair from the ARC.# A3 Y- a: l/ l# B1 Z( l; ~4 N
+ N+ R# K8 q) o$ O+ f0 a
DISCLOSURES# Z( H3 y/ M! R/ f* U6 {2 e3 b

( y# }8 |, `* ]) SThe authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.: x2 |- G( a+ A9 y0 O3 h! M3 H: P
          【参考文献】
/ ]- H/ j+ X: y4 u$ g7 B9 P ' m+ K0 F& |1 z/ Q+ @. u
5 k3 l$ J' Q, T& O
Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1991;9:641¨C650.
2 p( r) o( S9 Q  u
: @8 @5 C5 H% y. n7 p8 g/ A1 [Caplan AI, Bruder SP. Mesenchymal stem cells: Building blocks for molecular medicine in the 21st century. Trends Mol Med 2001;7:259¨C264.! E" G2 \- @2 S; k+ P9 E8 Q8 S1 [
/ _. g: _; ?! H9 U+ u, [3 L
Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 2002;418:41¨C49.1 p& k% e( e' P2 m' b! l" ?2 U% d
/ c1 [5 p9 y5 Y4 p9 O$ X
Suva D, Garavaglia G, Menetrey J et al. Non-hematopoietic human bone marrow contains long-lasting, pluripotential mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 2004;198:110¨C118.
" e* W4 k4 j: b1 Q3 e& ~  O9 G. _
# e: |- @- V( S& K) {- {D¡¯Ippolito G, Diabira S, Howard GA et al. Marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells, a unique population of postnatal young and old human cells with extensive expansion and differentiation potential. J Cell Sci 2004;117:2971¨C2981.
# p5 Z: x! B, E% p- j: U
1 x0 ^8 r, B4 C$ j6 D2 lFibbe WE. Mesenchymal stem cells. A potential source for skeletal repair. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61(suppl 2):ii29¨Cii31.+ h0 D! y/ B# Q& f1 \1 l
7 t' d! ?6 z7 A; P# r! I, D
Kassem M, Mosekilde L, Eriksen EF. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 potentiates fluoride-stimulated collagen type I production in cultures of human bone marrow stromal osteoblast-like cells. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1453¨C1458.
9 p0 y& X- \& p: m" v# k: O) D
' A6 ~- t7 |# x/ \4 r) aDennis JE, Carbillet JP, Caplan AI et al. The STRO-1  marrow cell population is multipotential. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;170:73¨C82., r1 g( P% c' G# C% l/ Q
+ ~. O1 J! B; }9 m6 D
Reyes M, Lund T, Lenvik T et al. Purification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal progenitor cells. Blood 2001;98:2615¨C2625.& F/ h: n* i& @
) {$ v4 M$ {% R# E* H) w6 H
Lodie TA, Blickarz CE, Devarakonda TJ et al. Systematic analysis of reportedly distinct populations of multipotent bone marrow-derived stem cells reveals a lack of distinction. Tissue Eng 2002;8:739¨C751.8 s' b3 T9 c5 S" F; V; g
# C1 H, ]* k7 j# r( j
Deschaseaux F, Gindraux F, Saadi R et al. Direct selection of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells using an anti-CD49a antibody reveals their CD45med, low phenotype. Br J Haematol 2003;122:506¨C517.3 s2 a% C6 X) g( d# c$ e

$ j% c5 K  Q% v: l; t5 d/ DHeng BC, Cao T, Lee EH. Directing stem cell differentiation into the chondrogenic lineage in vitro. STEM CELLS 2004;22:1152¨C1167.
) W  g, z7 |1 D# o7 l& Y* w; K0 E' \/ V+ U1 K
Banfi A, Bianchi G, Notaro R et al. Replicative aging and gene expression in long-term cultures of human bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng 2002;8:901¨C910.
$ v: A8 u6 U; v2 [
& E; a( I( N; y' V, S5 ~3 h& QSimonsen JL, Rosada C, Serakinci N et al. Telomerase expression extends the proliferative life-span and maintains the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow stromal cells. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:592¨C596.
) q) ?% c9 n4 S9 t
" L+ G0 D1 G2 b. `. @1 E# ]Parsch D, Fellenberg J, Brummendorf TH et al. Telomere length and telomerase activity during expansion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. J Mol Med 2004;82:49¨C55.
9 I) N1 T" a: I0 |$ @, r4 t9 ~
" @0 \% R; v; DMartin I, Muraglia A, Campanile G et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 supports ex vivo expansion and maintenance of osteogenic precursors from human bone marrow. Endocrinology 1997;138:4456¨C4462.5 m  K4 }/ u! V: ]+ o! B. }

& C; V' z/ t9 J) l2 i% YBianchi G, Banfi A, Mastrogiacomo M et al. Ex vivo enrichment of mesenchymal cell progenitors by fibroblast growth factor 2. Exp Cell Res 2003;287:98¨C105.
0 K3 l& U0 M# c! n
, o0 b. G- a4 }% KSolchaga LA, Penick K, Porter JD et al. FGF-2 enhances the mitotic and chondrogenic potentials of human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 2005;203:398¨C409.8 B% n! P, ^, w1 t
/ f' f$ B0 s( `# N( r9 s
Serakinci N, Guldberg P, Burns JS et al. Adult human mesenchymal stem cell as a target for neoplastic transformation. Oncogene 2004;23:5095¨C5098.
9 O8 m9 w1 Z) p  m# I
6 K/ \% f$ Q, {4 d: }% w5 [Tsai RY, McKay RD. A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferation in stem cells and cancer cells. Genes Dev 2002;16:2991¨C3003.
- W! t6 ~2 D& a3 Q& b, H" {5 S; ^! ^# `! G' i0 k
Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. The nucleolus: At the stem of immortality. Nat Med 2003;9:24¨C25.1 d# e* M$ S1 c6 t
( P, m% I) D& I" \
Normile D. Cell proliferation. Common control for cancer, stem cells. Science 2002;298:1869., ]1 _4 o5 B  `  [

6 W5 S$ V5 O9 ]) O- @! _Bruder SP, Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE. Growth kinetics, self-renewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation. J Cell Biochem 1997;64:278¨C294." I  I# i+ ^3 g

( U8 ~3 D, t; A( ^5 B% fDigirolamo CM, Stokes D, Colter D et al. Propagation and senescence of human marrow stromal cells in culture: A simple colony-forming assay identifies samples with the greatest potential to propagate and differentiate. Br J Haematol 1999;107:275¨C281." D/ i  D; L* w- e

7 S; [1 h, A% P9 p5 b- \Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI et al. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 1998; 238:265¨C272.* s1 ], m1 _  j/ M) u; T& I( |& Y
8 b1 W/ Q( R) K4 R4 P6 b% b
Handley CJ, Buttle DJ. Assay of proteoglycan degradation. Methods Enzymol 1995;248:47¨C58.9 q, k5 p" @) {& N- Z& B

' S' R& x" Q8 a0 rHollander AP, Heathfield TF, Webber C et al. Increased damage to type II collagen in osteoarthritic articular cartilage detected by a new immunoassay. J Clin Invest 1994;93:1722¨C1732.
- w- V, U7 Z& s# w+ d
& ]' ]- ~- c" Y( o' k5 dRaff T, van der Giet M, Endemann D et al. Design and testing of beta-actin primers for RT-PCR that do not co-amplify processed pseudogenes. Biotechniques 1997;23:456¨C460.
* |- q1 p2 Q* L4 U
2 `# Q3 p; Z& P$ nBaddoo M, Hill K, Wilkinson R et al. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from murine bone marrow by negative selection. J Cell Biochem 2003;89:1235¨C1249.
+ x( `) |; e7 V& x# F: @+ Z/ m& J! y8 B; T! q4 N" B
Tsai RY, McKay RD. A multistep, GTP-driven mechanism controlling the dynamic cycling of nucleostemin. J Cell Biol 2005;168:179¨C184.. e* }0 u& G9 l4 a8 a. R

# D8 T# o4 z( ]* X$ O) q7 lPittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143¨C147.7 I; x, [4 Z4 E0 ^4 L% b1 V" @

& a/ s) G3 J& z- w; T* f! _Liu SJ, Cai ZW, Liu YJ et al. Role of nucleostemin in growth regulation of gastric cancer, liver cancer and other malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1246¨C1249.: u+ Y3 r! i/ t5 {$ W6 ~; [
+ B" o$ D. K  L$ ^+ O
Sijin L, Ziwei C, Yajun L et al. The effect of knocking-down nucleostemin gene expression on the in vitro proliferation and in vivo tumorigenesis of HeLa cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004;23:529¨C538.
% X# {( d( M% g& \0 m) ^
! K( T3 |- D" o  o/ mMigdalska A, Molineux G, Demuynck H et al. Growth inhibitory effects of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in vivo. Growth Factors 1991;4:239¨C245.

Rank: 2

积分
72 
威望
72  
包包
1859  
沙发
发表于 2015-5-24 09:53 |只看该作者
知道了 不错~~~  

Rank: 2

积分
79 
威望
79  
包包
1769  
藤椅
发表于 2015-6-26 08:18 |只看该作者
希望大家帮我把这个帖发给你身边的人,谢谢!  

Rank: 2

积分
162 
威望
162  
包包
1724  
板凳
发表于 2015-7-16 13:27 |只看该作者
干细胞之家微信公众号
顶.支持,路过.....  

Rank: 2

积分
56 
威望
56  
包包
1853  
报纸
发表于 2015-7-30 22:26 |只看该作者
加油啊!!!!顶哦!!!!!  

Rank: 2

积分
68 
威望
68  
包包
1752  
地板
发表于 2015-8-13 11:33 |只看该作者
任何的限制,都是从自己的内心开始的。  

Rank: 2

积分
118 
威望
118  
包包
1769  
7
发表于 2015-8-15 15:42 |只看该作者
脂肪干细胞

Rank: 2

积分
132 
威望
132  
包包
1727  
8
发表于 2015-8-24 15:10 |只看该作者
肿瘤干细胞

Rank: 2

积分
89 
威望
89  
包包
1794  
9
发表于 2015-10-8 01:42 |只看该作者
哈哈,有意思~顶顶 ,继续顶顶。继续顶哦  

Rank: 2

积分
80 
威望
80  
包包
1719  
10
发表于 2015-10-20 15:18 |只看该作者
终于看完了~~~  
‹ 上一主题|下一主题
你需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册
验证问答 换一个

Archiver|干细胞之家 ( 吉ICP备2021004615号-3 )

GMT+8, 2025-6-27 20:27

Powered by Discuz! X1.5

© 2001-2010 Comsenz Inc.