|
- 积分
- 1
- 威望
- 1
- 包包
- 292
|
本帖最后由 细胞海洋 于 2013-9-9 10:21 编辑
- z) C; k+ D7 P6 V: G) C6 q; g* ?8 o# h; ]8 ?% K4 J O
The apparent use of sarin to kill more than 1,400 civilians in
) ?, Q. w) {8 N/ u, Q* dDamascus on 21 August may highlight the limits of the Chemical
+ c, M# h( F. ?; I$ x8 lWeapons Convention (CWC) — but that does not mean that
3 B& u; P6 _- `& kthe world can afford to turn its back on such treaties.) L6 Q& N9 B5 W, M! ^$ {9 n: f
The role of international treaties in restricting the proliferation of
( h1 S: C6 \2 ynuclear, chemical and biological weapons has not had a good press in/ G: U8 ?$ ?% ~1 l. Q
recent years. Conventional wisdom tends to scorn the value of such
2 X( \* n/ m3 j# x‘pieces of paper’ in real politick. Critics from both the left and the right
; }4 n0 W' K/ B9 ]0 sheap derision on their selective reach and implementation.7 z# Z& l+ ?2 g; t5 A6 H* K- s- S
Yet these treaties are crucial to everyone who is interested in making
# j5 E' p( |5 b: g- Fwars less barbaric and less frequent. Pieces of paper they may be, but
9 b/ f) i6 M( w* A) b$ q/ vlarge powers adhere to their contents with care, as do the smaller ones5 n6 f' ?8 j& k' j3 ]
who crave international respectability.- M6 m' g: t# E9 a1 T. |4 m ^8 h
- i; A) k; z: ?
]: |. r- [" {4 A: s[hide][/hide] |
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？注册
-
总评分: 包包 + 20
查看全部评分
|
发表于 2013-9-5 17:01
发表于 2013-9-5 21:10
